Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Discerning Tories

Cranmer was encouraged to read an article in The Times by Michael Gove MP, and a letter in The Daily Telegraph from the now retired Winston S Churchill. He reproduces both for your edification:

Wisest words come from a churchman

The bestseller charts in recent months would seem to indicate that most people believe religion, like fishpaste and sock-suspenders, is a drearily unfashionable anachronism indulged in only by a few antique eccentrics.

The dominance of works by A. C. Grayling, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens and, above all, Richard Dawkins, all give the impression that any of us who harbour a faith in any sort of God are in the grip of a tragic delusion.

But if an established Church is merely institutionalised superstition, then why is it that probably the most sensible thing said by any public figure last week came from one of those spinners of fairytales?

John Sentamu, the Archbishop of York, calmly pointed out that the situation in Zimbabwe is a towering moral disgrace. And we need a campaign to topple President Mugabe every bit as urgent as past crusades to get rid of apartheid. He also reminded us that Kate and Gerry McCann weren’t just probably innocent. They are totally innocent. And they will be until the situation ever arises that they have been tried, and found guilty, in a forum better designed to arrive at the truth than the media. One thing is certain: they have lost a daughter and their daily suffering must be torture. Christianity teaches us to show compassion to individuals who find themselves in such a position.

With his affirmation of the need for justice towards the poorest, and love for those who suffer, Sentamu may not speak as wittily as Dawkins. But I think I know whose moral force is more likely to mobilise action against dictatorship and win sympathy for a family enduring agonies that none should know.


Islamist danger

Sir – Britain sends some of the finest and most courageous of their generation to risk their lives and spill their blood chasing the Taliban out of Afghanistan. But who, meanwhile, is guarding our homeland?

A recent police report makes clear that, back here in Britain the Deobandi – the very same Islamist sect responsible for spawning the Taliban in Afghanistan – has succeeded in taking over more than 600 of Britain's 1,350 mosques. In addition, it controls 17 of Britain's 26 Islamic seminaries and produces 80 per cent of Britain's home-trained Islamic clerics.

It's a funny old world, as Margaret Thatcher once famously remarked. Except that this is no laughing matter. Not for 70 years has there been a more clear or present danger to our internal security, to our free society and to our democracy, than that posed by this vipers' nest in our midst. The Deobandi, an ultra- conservative sect, outlaws music, art, television and football, and also demands the entire concealment of women.

According to the Lancashire Council of Mosques, the Deobandi has now taken control of 59 out of 75 mosques in the old Lancashire mill towns of Oldham, Preston, Bury, Blackburn and Burnley. While not all Deobandis are extremist, leading preachers of this sect aim to radicalise the Islamic youth of Britain, and to mobilise them against our society and the freedoms we hold so dear.

When will the Government wake up to this mortal threat which – if not swiftly dealt with – threatens to bring strife and bloodshed to the streets of Britain on a scale far exceeding anything seen in the bombings of recent years?

Why are Gordon Brown and David Cameron, indeed our entire political class, so deafeningly silent on this, the most pressing matter confronting Britain today? Who will help the moderate majority of Muslims maintain control of their mosques? Who will safeguard the homeland?


Winston S. Churchill, London SW1

It is heartening indeed to hear of Conservative politicians who are prepared at this important hour to advocate the primacy of the Christian faith and to alert the nation to the enemy within. May the Lord bless and protect both.

20 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Who will help the moderate majority of Muslims maintain control of their mosques? "
Does this moderate majority exist ?

19 September 2007 at 09:42  
Anonymous Dr. Irene Lancaster FRSA said...

Michael Gove is one of the people I regard as a Tsaddik and posted as such on my blog before emigrating to Israel.

http://irenelancaster.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/06/tsaddik_no_10_m.html

As for the takeover of northern areas such as Blacburn by Muslim extremists and their Christian and academic supporters: I also posted on this here:

http://irenelancaster.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/05/clitheroe_are_y.html

and here

http://irenelancaster.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/07/day_out.html


It is worrying to think that all my worst fears about Britain are now being confirmed by some of the powers that be, but why were people like me not heeded in the first place, and what can be done to stem this tide of terrifying appeasement to the forces of evil, because - believe me - that is what they are.

19 September 2007 at 12:37  
Anonymous Voyager said...

why were people like me not heeded in the first place,

You should read up on British history - a consistent pattern of ignoring inconvenient truths, a fetish of self-delusion, and a complacent ignorance of any threat motivated by ideology - this is a country that despises structured or systematic thinking and has a terrible habit of not communicating intentions to outsiders so that misunderstandings inevitably lead to war

19 September 2007 at 13:01  
Anonymous Dr. Irene Lancaster FRSa said...

I agree about the British dismissal of all ideologies as non-serious matters, but Churchill senior was certainly not unaware of the dangers of Hitler, nor of Islam.

Closer to home, I recently wrote to Gordon Brown regarding the virulently anti-Israel webpage of the Church of Scotland, of which he is a member. Brown had recently addressed the Board of Deputies of British Jews, painting his rosy view of Israel, visited it seems by his father, who had been a cleric in the Church of Scotland.

I didn't even receive an acknowledgement to my very polite letter. If anyone has Brown's contact details, I would be grateful. The Church of Scotland cannot be allowed to get away with their lies, especially as I am now teaching at their school in Jaffa, which does not appear to share the views of the mother Church north of the border!

No doubt, I shall be fired for writing this, but think of all the adverse publicity that will cause!

19 September 2007 at 14:20  
Blogger Wrinkled Weasel said...

Yes, I agree with most of what messrs Gove and Churchill have to say. May I add that whilst we are weak on resolve, as a nation we are high on ingenuity in a crisis. It served us well for several hundred years.

No doubt, the threat from Islamism will increase and no doubt the public chipping away at religious belief will continue, but as we "never shall be slaves" reason will return. Dawkins and his associates will wane in popularity before too long and a truth will rise, as Luis Aragon said,

"Can the knowledge deriving from reason even begin to compare with knowledge perceptible by sense?"

The sense of God is everywhere and freedom is in the scent of a garden in the gloaming.(WW)

19 September 2007 at 15:06  
Anonymous Tanfield said...

Your Grace,
Excellent post and both are absolutely right. It all boils down to one question. Who is there in National UK politics or elsewhere in UK public life now who can deal satisfactorily with the matters referred to by the Archbishop of York and save us from the Islamic threat as Churchill did for us in WW2.?

19 September 2007 at 16:46  
Anonymous 4micah said...

Best to hale those British MPs who allowed this to happen before a tribunal to answer the following "Was it your perfidy or your ignorance that compelled you to open the gates of Britain and let in these zealots that now imperil British lives and liberty?"

19 September 2007 at 17:01  
Anonymous nedsherry said...

John Sentamu, the Archbishop of York, calmly pointed out that the situation in Zimbabwe is a towering moral disgrace. And we need a campaign to topple President Mugabe every bit as urgent as past crusades to get rid of apartheid.

Crusade to create the disaster, then crusade to end it. 'Anti-racists' like Senatmu ended white rule in Zimbabwe and we are now seeing the fruits of their labours. Gove is a typically warped political egomaniac, seeking power for his own ends, not for the benefit of the UK.

It is worrying to think that all my worst fears about Britain are now being confirmed by some of the powers that be, but why were people like me not heeded in the first place, and what can be done to stem this tide of terrifying appeasement to the forces of evil, because - believe me - that is what they are.

Did you oppose the mass immigration that established the Muslim Fifth Column in the UK, Dr Lancaster? Or did you, like so many other Jews, see it as a useful means of ending white 'hegemony' and safeguarding those all-important Jewish interests?

19 September 2007 at 17:27  
Anonymous CCTV said...

but Churchill senior was certainly not unaware of the dangers of Hitler, nor of Islam.

He had a romanticised notion of French capacities which misled him...


'Anti-racists' like Senatmu ended white rule in Zimbabwe

Do tell me how.....I thought it was Margaret Thatcher who installed Mugabe as a result of the Lancaster House Agreement....

19 September 2007 at 18:31  
Anonymous Dr. Irene Lancaster FRSA said...

Dear Ned Sherry

Most of the suicide bombers in Britain were born here like you. Therefore opposing their 'immigration' to this country would have been a non-starter, as, like you, they are home-grown Brits with an axe to grind.

I have certainly spoken out, and vociferously, against the Labour Party's immigration policy that lets in people who France and Germany have rejected, for instance.

As for colour of skin, most Jews in Britain are 'white' and I fail to see where colour comes into the equation in any case.

As for your comments on Michael Gove, I suggest you think very carefully about using such defamatory language in future.

19 September 2007 at 19:38  
Anonymous nedsherry said...

cctv writes:

Do tell me how.....I thought it was Margaret Thatcher who installed Mugabe as a result of the Lancaster House Agreement....

Has it ever occurred to you that the Lancaster House Agreement did not appear ex nihilo and that Margaret Thatcher might not have 'installed' Mugabe entirely of her own accord? If it hasn't, go away and ponder the possibility. You will then find yourself equipped to understand references to Harold Wilson and 'the Seventies' in this piece by Peter Simple about the anti-racist Colin Legum:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2003/06/20/do2004.xml

Dr Lancaster writes:

Most of the suicide bombers in Britain were born here like you. Therefore opposing their 'immigration' to this country would have been a non-starter, as, like you, they are home-grown Brits with an axe to grind.

Dear me, what breathtaking dishonesty. Or should I call it chutzpah? They are here as a result of immigration that was opposed by the white majority, but supported by groups like the Board of Deputies. As so often, this tiny and powerless group got its way. If it hadn't got its way, we wouldn't have the present Muslim problem. Q.E.D.

I have certainly spoken out, and vociferously, against the Labour Party's immigration policy that lets in people who France and Germany have rejected, for instance.

On what ground do you speak out? That they pose a threat to the only group whose welfare you're concerned about?

As for colour of skin, most Jews in Britain are 'white'

Colour of skin is only one aspect of race and Jews are not white in the full racial sense.

and I fail to see where colour comes into the equation in any case.

Islam is a non-white religion as alien to the UK as its non-white adherents. As I've pointed out elsewhere, racial antagonisms feed on religious, and vice versâ.

As for your comments on Michael Gove, I suggest you think very carefully about using such defamatory language in future.

Why? I didn't realize things had got so bad in the UK that one can't say what one thinks about specimens like Gove. Is the Board of Deputies planning new laws to protect its shabbos goiim from criticism?

19 September 2007 at 22:11  
Anonymous CCTV said...

Has it ever occurred to you that the Lancaster House Agreement did not appear ex nihilo and that Margaret Thatcher might not have 'installed' Mugabe entirely of her own accord? If it hasn't, go away and ponder the possibility.

Of course it did not appear ex-nihilo - nor did Margaret Thatcher or Lord Carrington - very little in British political life appears ex-nihilo.

The fact remains that Tiny Rowland sponsored Joshua Nkomo and Ian Smith sponsored Abel Muzorewa....but the Foreign Office installed Mugabe.

Why South Africa has not been told its currency will be trashed unless it cuts off electricity to Zimbabwe and accepts Nigerian troops entering Zimbabwe from South Africa, can only be explained as a lack of will by the political elite in Great Britain

20 September 2007 at 06:59  
Anonymous Dr. Irene Lancaster FRSA said...

Dear Ned Sherry

Islam is a religion with quite a few converts who are 'white' in your terms. These are also often some of the most vociferously Islamicist offenders.

A case of 'More Catholic than the Pope', maybe?

Your ideas of a Jewish conspiracy led by the Board of Deputies, which is democratically elected and so includes people with a variety of views on a number of subjects make you look like a laughing stock.

If you wish to attack people like Michael Gove, then you will have to expect the same in kind.

You are one of those old-fashioned neo-fascist racists who most of us had hoped had gone the way of all flesh, but as Ruth Gledhill of The Times once said to me when we discussed her starting her own blog:

"Better that we expose the filth that is still around than leave it to fester".

Oh and by the way, I am not, and never have been, a member of the Board of Deputies.

However, you will be delighted to hear that I have taken your advice and moved out of Britain to Israel, where I'm sure you agree, I belong!

20 September 2007 at 13:32  
Anonymous nedsherry said...

Dear Dr Lancaster,

Islam is a religion with quite a few converts who are 'white' in your terms. These are also often some of the most vociferously Islamicist offenders.

Indeed, Islam contains representatives of every race of earth. So do Christianity, Judaism and Buddhism. Are we therefore to conclude that these religions are all the same and all equally at home in every country on earth?

Your ideas of a Jewish conspiracy led by the Board of Deputies, which is democratically elected and so includes people with a variety of views on a number of subjects make you look like a laughing stock.

Where do I mention a conspiracy? Do you believe in an Islamic conspiracy because you think Muslims work for their own ends at the expense of others?

If you wish to attack people like Michael Gove, then you will have to expect the same in kind.

Fine.

You are one of those old-fashioned neo-fascist racists...

And you're one of those even more old-fashioned Judaeocentric racists who will happily see other people's nations wrecked in pursuit of Jewish ends.

who most of us had hoped had gone the way of all flesh, but as Ruth Gledhill of The Times once said to me when we discussed her starting her own blog:

"Better that we expose the filth that is still around than leave it to fester".


Being sexist as well as racist, I don't think much of the female intellect. Learning that you are chums with Ruth G. is therefore a great comfort to me.

20 September 2007 at 15:34  
Anonymous nedsherry said...

Why South Africa has not been told its currency will be trashed unless it cuts off electricity to Zimbabwe and accepts Nigerian troops entering Zimbabwe from South Africa, can only be explained as a lack of will by the political elite in Great Britain

The political elite do not care about whites. That's the simple truth of the matter.

20 September 2007 at 15:35  
Blogger Mission Impossible said...

Ruth Gledhill works for The Times, which, as we know, is owned by Rupert Murdoch's News International (thru News Corporation; an entity now registered in the Zionist dominated USA).

Rupert Murdoch has strong, Zionist sympathies. He is deeply philosemitic and fully committed to Israel. This probably stems from a close relationship early in his career with Leonard Goldenson, who founded the American Broadcasting Company (ABC) and was a major figure in the New York Jewish Establishment. Indeed, most of Murdoch's closest friends and business advisors have been wealthy, influential New York Jews.

All of Murdoch's publications take strongly pro-Jewish lines, such as The Weekly Standard, the premier neo-conservative magazine, once edited by William Kristol (a co-creator of neocon ideology).

Murdoch has developed close relationships with several prominent Jewish figures in the New York establishment, including attorney Howard Squadron: President of the powerful American Jewish Congress and head of the Council of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations ... and investment banker Stanley Schuman.

------------------------------------------------------------
Jews in America constitute less than 3% of the total population yet they have been seen to comprise around 59% [Lichter, et al, 1983, p.55] of America's media elite. That percentage figure share has since increased. This means the Jewish diaspora in the USA is over-represented in the country's media by a whopping 2000%+.
------------------------------------------------------------

Their dominance of the British media is even more complete. For brevity, I shall spare you the long litany of proof.

Because the West's media is controlled by an alien elite, we are constantly being bombarded with polemics that argue Western Civilization is dying, failing, and about to be eclipsed by the Pacific Rim or even India. Characters who oppose cultural pluralism (e.g. nedsherry) are portrayed as stupid, bigoted, extremists, etc., by those who actively conspire with the great con-trick, such as: Dr. Irene Lancaster, FRSA, Dame of England, Honourary Member of the Illuminati, MENSA ChairPerson, Anobe Kanobe, etc., etc.

Dr. Lancaster uses the oft-repeated rhetorical trick favoured by most Jewish commentators: that any departure from racial and ethnic harmony must -- by definition -- be entirely the result of white racism.

Television "invariably depicts anti-Semitism as an ugly, abhorrent trait that must be fought at every turn [Pearl & Pearl 1999, p.6]. Anti-Semitism is seen as metaphysical and beyond analysis. There is never any rational explanation for it; instead, anti-Semitism is portrayed as an absolute, irrational evil. There is also the constant implication that anti-Semitism is a proper concern of the entire community.

To be a Westerner today means living in a world (gone nuts) where Psychoanalytic Jews race around looking to save non-Jews from their neuroses, where radical Jews are out to save the world from the evils of Gentile capitalism, and where Christians are portrayed as phychopaths (please look more closely at the underlying content of Hollywood movies --- over 60% controlled by Jews or Jewish interests --- that endlessly portray themes showing white men in a bad light: murderers, rapists, stalkers, robbers, swindlers, racists, or stupid, etc., etc. Since the 1960s, it has become rare to see white men portrayed as heroic figures, and even rarer to see white men fighting for their own White Culture portrayed as heroes. On the odd occasion they are, movie producers ensure they are offset by non-white heroes. These omissions are deliberate and calculated).

We are also (and still) endlessly bombarded with references to Hitler and Naziism. Yet another leader story on Nazi Germany appeared in the Jewish owned (London) Telegraph today. That makes about 8 Nazi Germany related stories published during the past two months alone. Only yesterday it published circa 7 photographs of Nazi concentration camp staff with the comment: they look surprisingly human.

Most of the damage done to British culture and social cohesion since 1950 has been engineered through its insane Immigration Policies, by shadowy figures occupying committees, NGOS, or by high-tiered figures in the Civil Service who are Jewish or have Jewish connections, or are following a Jewish ideology: Communism. As I have already highlighted, The Rowntree Trust is one such seditious creature. Nedsherry has also pointed to the Board of Deputies.

The more Jews are exposed, the more angry, rude, and threatening they become. This has been the pattern in every place and at every time throughout history. Discussion soon gives way to threats:

As for your comments on Michael Gove, I suggest you think very carefully about using such defamatory language in future.

21 September 2007 at 09:32  
Anonymous najistani said...

Mission impossible said "Most of the damage done to British culture and social cohesion since 1950 has been engineered through its insane Immigration Policies, by shadowy figures occupying committees, NGOS, or by high-tiered figures in the Civil Service who are Jewish or have Jewish connections, or are following a Jewish ideology: Communism."

So the evil Jooooooooooooooz are responsible for our present Muslim infestation? Call me Mr Thicko but I really can't see how the Elders of Zion are going to benefit from the rapidly progressing Islamisation of Britain.

21 September 2007 at 10:16  
Blogger Mission Impossible said...

najistani ... truth is more often than not, stranger than fiction.

I have never believed there was a plot to infest Britain with Muslim immigrants ... simply immigrants: so long as they were non-European. As Pakistan and Bangladesh are both members of the Commonwealth, both over-populated, and thus economically poor, they became primary candidates for mass immigration to Britain. Perhaps certain members of the British Establishment have a soft-spot for the people of their old stomping grounds in what was formerly British-India? Rubbing shoulders with the Agha Khan and all that.

The Pakistani and Bangladeshi culture of extended families (to the Nth degree, until whole villages were emigrated) helped by incest (marriage to first cousins) simply amplified the process.

I have no need to call you 'Mr. Thicko.' It is simply that you have not yet familiarized yourself with the information that is out there. It is not going to be given to you; you will have to make the effort yourself. I can assure you, it is a very empowering experience to make the effort. So, it is up to you. I stumbled across the truth by accident, when I was busy researching something else entirely. One thing then led to another. Now, for the first time in my life, I can understand the complexity of the 20th century in its broader terms. You could too.

Look, you don't really expect someone is going to hold up his or her hands and say, sorry, it was us all along. We're the ones who have played with your laws to fess up your culture ... do you??

To make sense of what has happened, you have to pick your way through a maze of lies, counter-lies, deceptions, and counter-deceptions. The only way of making sense of it all is to identify patterns. Twice can mean a coincidence, but by the time you get to the third, fourth, or even seventh repetition, then one simply has to stop being foolish and naive and reject orthodoxy, unless you prefer to be taken for a sucker that is.

I have written elsewhere in the Cranmer pages ... it is NOT THE Jews that have caused us problems (for example, the comedians Peter Sellers and Borat, plus the Jazz singer Amy Whitehouse, are all Jews); rather it is a certain class of Jews who are either brought up to believe they are superior to the rest of us, or because they are following the teachings of the Talmud (and Kabbala). Such people care not where they live or with whom they live, so long as they can maintain control and thus be masters of their own destiny; and damn the majority, for they are just pawns. Once you get to these levels of influence, enough ignorant or short-sighted Gentiles will cooperate because it pays them to do so: either in terms of personal wealth or in personal power. Secret societies are nothing more than a ruse to stroke a member's ego.

The rise of Islamism in Britain, and much of Europe, is actually the end product of a phenomenon known as: the law of unintended consequences.

21 September 2007 at 11:30  
Anonymous nedsherry said...

So the evil Jooooooooooooooz are responsible for our present Muslim infestation? Call me Mr Thicko but I really can't see how the Elders of Zion are going to benefit from the rapidly progressing Islamisation of Britain.

This is the explanation (and please note that I am quoting a Jewish journalist):

Given the wildly overwrought suspicions that some Jews harbor about the American Christian majority who are in fact the Jews' best friends in the world, it is not surprising that these Jews look at mass Third-World and Moslem immigration, not as a danger to themselves, but as the ultimate guarantor of their own safety, hoping that in a racially diversified, de-Christianized America, the waning majority culture will lack the power, even if it still has the desire, to persecute Jews. The self-protective instinct to divide and weaken a potentially oppressive majority population may have served Jews well at certain times and places in the past when they truly were threatened. Under current circumstances—in America, the most philo-Semitic nation in the history of the world—it both morally wrong and suicidal. Not only are the open-borders Jews urging policies harmful to America's majority population, but, by doing so, they are surely triggering previously non-existent anti-Jewish feelings among them. The tragedy is that once a collective thought pattern gets deeply ingrained, as is the Jews' historically understandable fear of gentiles, it takes on a life of its own and becomes immune to evidence and reason.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={B088749A-C286-48BD-AE6F-0D515394D5A0}

The question for Jews is always: What's best for us? They may have different answers to that question, but their interests are the only thing taht's important to them. Any non-Jew who doesn't put Jews first too is an enemy to be attacked. See Dr. Lancaster.

21 September 2007 at 17:54  
Anonymous Rob Spear said...

The entire concealment of women? What, even their eyes? Now, that *is* admirably fundamentalist.

7 October 2007 at 02:07  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Newer›  ‹Older