Friday, February 15, 2008

The Madness of Prince Charles

Whether induced by porphyria or not, Cranmer does not know, but the symptoms of mental instability, incomprehensible babbling and deranged behaviour were all manifest as the Prince of Wales declared himself a fan of the European Union. And it is looking increasingly likely that the man who has declared that he shall be ‘Defender of Faith’ and known as King George VII has indeed inherited the madness gene which afflicted a previous King George and other of his ancestors.

In his Brussels speech, the Prince of Wales described the fight against global climate change as a war, with the Doomsday Clock ‘ticking ever closer to midnight’. Apparently, ‘the lives of billions of people depend on (the EU’s) response and none of us will be forgiven by our children and grandchildren if we falter and fail’.

He said it needed the biggest public private partnership in history to solve the crisis - along with greater leadership from Europe: ‘Determined and principled leadership has never been more needed. Surely this is just the moment in history for which the European Union was created,’ he told the gathered MEPs who hung on his every word.

So global warming is ‘the moment in history for which the European Union was created’, is it? Nothing to do with fusing steel and coal production to prevent war; nothing to do with free trade or prosperity; nothing to do with feeding the Continent in the post-war decades; nothing to do with spreading a social doctrine that ensures minimum standards and working rights for all. Monnet and Schumann had the foresight to create an empire which would solve the problem of global warming. Genius. Pure prophetic genius. They must have had a direct line to the Almighty after all.

But why was the Prince of Wales advocating an increase in EU powers at such a sensitive time? Why was he permitted by the Government to enter the political fray at the time the Lisbon Treaty is making its way through Parliament and the people are being denied their promised referendum?

It is, as The Daily Mail observed ‘a clear political move’. A senior member of the Royal Family asking for more ‘determined’ leadership from the EU is evidence that the Royal Family may have been complicit in the whole EU project after all. And that all the protests about an infringed sovereignty, all the petitions for Her Majesty to defend our ancient rights, all the talk of treason against her person and status have all been ignored because they are all essentially in agreement with the formation of the new Empire. Prince Charles is the first Royal to give his overt blessing to the EU, yet it may now be surmised that others are covert europhiles.

When a rump Parliament, corrupt Church and a compromised Crown are all united in favour of ‘ever closer union’, only divine intervention, revolution, or a latter-day Cromwell can save the British people from the 'unavoidable' tyranny.

28 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

One sure sign of madness is, having spent at least the thick end of 60 years being called Charles, suddenly deciding that your name is George instead.

What planet do these people inhabit?

15 February 2008 at 10:22  
Anonymous oiznop said...

Its not so much a rump parliament as an over-mighty executive which offers opportunity for a 5-year tyrranical rule. While the Queen used to offer the people protection against this, it seems that they have now lost the protection of the Crown. Prince Charles is a buffoon for entering the EU arguement, and whoewver advised him to make this speech needs sacking.

15 February 2008 at 11:10  
Blogger paul ilc said...

Your Grace

HRH believes -- wrongly in my view -- that global warming/climate change is mainly man-made. However, he is entitled to his view, and I can see why he would mistakenly wish to enlist the EU (which I despise) to the cause, particularly when the UK Government is probably nudging him strongly to make such a speech. Moreover, I see little evidence that HRH is committed to the odious goal of "ever closer union".

As the High Tory and Monarchist that I am, may I respectfully remind Your Grace that injudicious or intemperate criticism of HRH can only feed republicanism - and the move to unpick the Elizabethan and post-1689 religious settlement? The consequences of such an unpicking would be dire.

A monarch's heir's right to ascend the throne is quite independent of his personal views or conduct, just as the validity of the sacraments is not dependent on the personal views or conduct of the priest administering them.

Aligning yourself with The Daily Mail and so the often vulgarly republican prejudices of the lower-middle-class (most of whom have been 'educated' far beyond their low level of intelligence) is very sad.

When a rump Parliament, corrupt Church and a compromised Crown are all united in favour of ‘ever closer union’, only divine intervention, revolution, or a latter-day Cromwell can save the British people from the 'unavoidable' tyranny.

"Revolution, or a latter-day Cromwell"?? Surely not! Revolutionism always and inevitably leads to misery and human suffering on a grand scale. And to invoke the name of the ghastly regicide Cromwell, whose corpse many monarchists would gleefully stone, is quite shocking.

The utterances of the Royal Family are the symptom, not the cause, of our moral and societal prdicament.

Now, though early in the day, one glass of fine claret is called for...!

15 February 2008 at 12:06  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Paul ilc,
I agree with the comment as to "global warming" but would take issue with your comments re HRH The Prince of Wales. To call on the evil EU to take a lead in anything other than shutting themselves down is disastrous. He has given them his backing in all things with that speech, which in the context of Great Britain should not be for him to do. Parliament and People are sovereign under the protection of the Crown.

15 February 2008 at 13:54  
Blogger Jomo said...

Why wouldn't the descendent of the Elector of Hanover support the re-establishment of the "Holy Roman Empire?"

The Monarchy and Parliament are in this together. The idea that the Queen, her successor or the Tory Party will do anything to stop the process of ever closer union is a fantasy.

The referendum campaign is a cynical attempt to prevent a split in the Tory Party and hopefully ruin Nulab. If there is a referendum after the next election no doubt the Government will advise the people to support the re-negotiated terms and vote yes to Europe.

We have been here before!

15 February 2008 at 16:58  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

paul ilc said:
...And to invoke the name of the ghastly regicide Cromwell, whose corpse many monarchists would gleefully stone, is quite shocking.

Touche Sir, history is written by the victor, except in this case, it was Cromwell who belatedly threw out the corrupt Parliament and despite chance after chance the King showed that he would sacrifice Britain for power leading to his inevitable demise.

It was Cromwell who put Britain on course to become a World Power, unrivalled at Sea and renowned throughout the globe, perhaps we shall not see another leader with the ability to grab the nation and Parliament by the scruff of the neck and stop the rot, perhaps in this day and age a better result would be another Guy Fawkes but this time not failing.

15 February 2008 at 18:01  
Anonymous hear o israel said...

your grace
whilst to quite few who read your blog will find this speaking to the EU by the prince unusual , it is consistant with his view on climate change. if the models on climate change are even 50% correct we are still in alot of trouble.
to put it bluntly we are re introducing carbon that was laid down over millions of years , from millions of years ago . the planet is recieving an injection of gases that have been out of its economy for millions of years. it was bound to have an effect.

i think he is speaking to the EU on the platform of somthing that is bigger than the EU its self .Last year drought affected the EU wheat crop there are no mountains of grain now , no buffers . Should this year be bad again then food prices will increase (even on cranmers table)and we may even short on our daily bread .
looking at the tone of it he is appealing to business/political structure , i dont think he is necessarily a supporter of the type of goverment , but he seems to be prompting it to change in its policies for a greater good .

if prince charles has had a bit of madness , i would think its at the madness of ruining nature he is very well informed ime told on these matters.

if he does support becoming part of somthing which i see as inherently corrupt and devoid of god and without asking me (as a free person of these isles), i dont think he was saying it in this speech .
i also dont know if he should comment on the EU , but equally labour are denying me the vote , i wonder if we should deny labour there parliment if they wont play fair !! queen Elizabeth is our protector i assume if there is a corruption of parliment.

15 February 2008 at 20:13  
Blogger AethelBald, King of Wessex said...

most of (the lower middle class) have been 'educated' far beyond their low level of intelligence

Blime orl Riley. What a piecan.

15 February 2008 at 20:39  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Heere Bigynneth the Tale of the Asse-Hatte.


With apologies to Geoffrey Chaucer

Thanks to www.Iowahawk.com


1 Whan in Februar, withe hise global warmynge
2 Midst unseasonabyl rain and stormynge
3 Gaia in hyr heat encourages
4 Englande folke to goon pilgrimages.
5 Frome everiches farme and shire
6 Frome London Towne and Lancanshire
7 The pilgryms toward Canterbury wended
8 Wyth fyve weke holiday leave extended
9 In hybryd Prius and Subaru
10 Off the Boughton Bypasse, east on M2.
11 Fouer and Twyntie theye came to seke
12 The Arche-Bishop, wyse and meke
13 Labouryte and hippye, Gaye and Greene
14 Anti-warre and libertyne
15 All sondry folke urbayne and progressyve
16 Vexed by Musselmans aggressyve.
17 Hie and thither to the Arche-Bishop's manse
18 The pilgryms ryde and fynde perchance
19 The hooly Bishop takynge tea
20 Whilste watching himselfe on BBC.
21 Heere was a hooly manne of peace
22 Withe bearyd of snow and wyld brows of fleece
23 Whilhom stoode athwart the Bush crusades
24 Withe peace march papier-mache paraydes.
25 Sayeth the pilgryms to Bishop Rowan,
26 "Father, we do not like howe thynges are goin'.
27 You know we are as Lefte as thee,
28 But of layte have beyn chaunced to see
29 From Edinburgh to London-towne
30 The Musslemans in burnoose gowne
31 Who beat theyr ownselfs with theyr knyves
32 Than goon home and beat theyr wyves
33 And slaye theyr daughtyrs in honour killlynge
34 Howe do we stoppe the bloode fromme spillynge?"
35 The Bishop sipped upon hys tea
36 And sayed, "an open mind must we
37 Keep, for know thee well the Mussel-man
38 Has hys own laws for hys own clan
39 So question not hys Muslim reason
40 And presaerve ye well social cohesion."
41 Sayth the libertine, "'tis well and goode
42 But sharia goes now where nae it should;
43 I liketh bigge buttes and I cannot lye,
44 You othere faelows can't denye,
45 But the council closed my wenching pub,
46 To please the Imams, aye thaere's the rub."
47 Sayeth the Bishop, strokynge his chin,
48 "To the Mosque-man, sexe is sinne
49 So as to staye in his goode-graces
50 Cover well thy wenches' faces
51 And abstain ye Chavs from ribaldry
52 Welcome him to our communitie."
53 "But Father Williams," sayed the Gaye-manne
54 "Though I am but a layman
55 The Mussleman youthes hath smyte me so
56 Whan on streets I saunter wyth my beau."
57 Sayed the Bishop in a curt replye
58 "I am as toolrant as anye oothere guy,
59 But if Mussleman law sayes no packynge fudge,
60 Really nowe, who are we to judge?"
61 Then bespake the Po-Mo artist,
62 "My last skulptyure was hailed as smartest
63 Bye sondry criticks at the Tate
64 Whom called it genius, brillyant, greate
65 A Jesus skulpted out of dunge
66 Earned four starres in the Guardian;
67 But now the same schtick withe Mo-ha-med
68 Has earned a bountye on my hed."
69 Sayed the Bishop, "that's quyte impressyve
70 To crafte a Jesus so transgressyve
71 But to do so with the Muslim Prophet
72 Doomed thy neck to lose whats off it.
73 Thou should have showen mor chivalrie
74 In committynge such a blasphemie."
75 And so it went, the pilgryms all
76 Complaynynge of the Muslim thrall;
77 To eaches same the Bishop lectured
78 About the cultur fabrick textured
79 With rainbow threyds from everie nation
80 With rainbow laws for all situations.
81 "But Father Rowan, we bathyr nae one
82 We onlye want to hav our funne!"
83 "But the Musselman is sure to see
84 Thy funne as Western hegemony.
85 'Tis not Cristian for Cristians to cause
86 The Moor to live by Cristendom's laws
87 Whan he has hise sovereyn culture
88 Crist bade us put ours in sepulture.
89 To be divyne we must first be diverse
90 So cheer thee well, thynges could be wors
91 Sharia is Englishe as tea and scones,
92 So everybody muste get stoned."
93 The pilgryms shuffled for the door
94 To face the rule of the Moor;
95 Poets, Professors, Starbucks workers
96 Donning turbans, veils and burqqas.
97 As they face theyr fynal curtan
98 Of Englande folk, one thynge is certan:
99 Dying by theyr own thousande cuts,
100 The Englande folk are folking nuts.
101 BURMA SHAVE

15 February 2008 at 21:18  
Blogger ENGLISHMAN said...

One can not expect anything better from a bilderburger,a member of the one world "government"plus all those juicy cap payments for a landowner of his size,at least with a republic you are not stuck with an hereditary fool,a traitor who despises the people he purports to by oath to protect.

15 February 2008 at 21:37  
Blogger ultramontane grumpy old catholic said...

Your Grace

A wonderful cautionary Canterbury tale posted by anonymous. That's brightened up my evening!

A few days ago, I noted that the blog of John Redwood called attention to an open letter to the General Secretary of the Un signed by a number of eminent scientists, to warn him that the UN climate conference was taking the world in entirely the wrong direction. I took the trouble to trace the reference and here it is:

http://www.nrsp.com/articles/07.12.13-open%20letter%20to%20the%20un%20secretary%20general.html

It's worth a look. It confirms a lot of our suspicions that the assertions that current climate change is a result of human action is by no means proven.

Certainly you cannot wager the economy of the western world on extrapolations of data, based on mathematical models.

However, I am not surprised at the doom laded remarks of HRH. He has long been a convert to the new green religion, which is already gaining all the trappings of the established religions; mortal sins (such as putting rubbish in the wrong bin, flying to foreign parts for pleasure; heresy (denial of man - made global warming); indulgences (paying to offest carbon consumption); time in purgatory (excoriation by the guardian or the BBC to expiate the size of one's carbon footprint which you have accumulated)

So if and when he comes to the throne in succession to Her Majesty (but long may she reign!), perhaps he intends to become Head of the C of G (Church of Greenery). Meanwhile our dear old CofE will be disestablished - and perhaps will have swum for safety across the Tiber.

15 February 2008 at 22:09  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry to bore the pants off of people, but it must be said again.

MMCO2=GW (as is the EU) is a ruling class agenda/conspiratorial plot inflicted on the people from above.

Using any cleaver long term method at their disposal the BBC being one of them. But most of our great universities and religious establishments being pretty much on message as well. One thing royals are well practiced at, apart from sexual deviancy and having an afflicted mind, bless um, is thinking in generations rather then years.

Al Gores mates backers and bankers THE ROCKS have more cash invested in this get very much richer scam, then the ordinary person could count in a thousand lifetimes.

Charley and his mums bankers THE ROTHS have almost as much of theirs invested in it also. The Goldsmiths and their chums are in for a bit of the action as well.

(SO I HEAR. I OF CAUSE COULD NOT POSSIBLY COMMENT ON WHETHER THIS IS TRUE OR NOT. It is just what people have said to me in the pub. They never gave their names wore black masks and just told me to hold this brown packet for a while. Unfortunately they never came back for it, honest guv.)

You don't possibly think these could be facts are connected do you Cranmer?

Could it be that its all just about power and big long term relatively massive, should all get 30 years at least, easy profits. Did not a rather dead princess mention when alive that her husband had a few bob on a small land mine company about a decade or so ago?

Perhaps Charley boys not as mad as you think, just more then a little greedy, not to say desperate to prove himself to mummy.

If it is possible to do so. (Sorry this is a silly question because I know its not) Could we have a look into what exactly the royals have their money in. Because it sure is not the Halifax and you can bet your life it is not Northern Rock either.

No one would want to spread malicious gossip, its far to dangerous to say the least, these or any days. So as Charley boy is so suddenly keen on politics especially the type designed to over tax to death his own people.

Perhaps its time we should all start really THINKING for a change and also begin to trust absolutely no one outside our own families. Even then only if they all keep their hands on the table. When BIG MONEY AND POWER are up for grabs.

Atlas shrugged and then had a very unfortunate accident.

15 February 2008 at 23:15  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

BTW

Apart from wishing I had not posted that last comment. Because it was highly irresponsible. I have a wife and 4 children to consider, after all.

I have this to say about your comments Cranmer. This blog gets better everyday. I can see that you are not just an unfairly roasted pretty face. Possibly even the sharpest pencil in the case by far.

However personally I would call it a counter revolution as it seems we may have sort of had one already and not properly noticed yet. Cleaver people that BBC.

Atlas shrugged, and wished he had just stayed in bed, and left everything to the really smart people.

15 February 2008 at 23:38  
Anonymous hear o israel said...

your grace
it seems my earlier post caused an outbreak of troll law ,3 laws safe !

what puzzles me with people who doubt global heating theory , is how it is cited as coincidental .

they accept that the planet is heating up , but explain that it could be more natural causes.

even if it is more er natural causes then wont the effects still be same.

being as UN panel say its 80% certain its mans effect that we are seeing , i read that as an alarm call that they think somthing is wrong , never mind the cause.

given that prince charles does speak with quite a few of our brightest minds , to just pass it off as a bit of royalist spin , seems to show a rather odd desire not to know the truth.

please note some very big thinkers have now said , somthing is very wrong with our climate . i am sure that they do not wish to be publically made asses of wether in tribute to HRH or not .

whilst cranmers blog useually puts the theological/political construct in play .i would appreciate it if anyone on here who doubts global heating theory , could tell me what would be the conclusive proof for them !!
i say this as calling one theory bogus whilst not reasoning why, is not science, reason or debate.

HRH i think is trying to explain the urgency of the debate , millions will die , and ecosystems lost or broken if we dont act when we should have . saying its fake science just for spins sake , i hope will have purpetrators feeling a lifetime of guilt for talking rubbish and delaying action that was needed .

16 February 2008 at 00:16  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

H o I

I do not know whether the temperature is rising or not. When I wish to give myself a clue I usually stick my head out of the window. When the BBC tells me its going to be bright sunny and very warm I take a rain coat with me and a thick scarf.

Many things would make me believe that the planet is getting warmer.

When I walk about outside in December and get sun stroke in Hide Park for example. In fact it would be very easy indeed for me to believe such a thing. It happens all of the time.

But what I would not believe even if the whole world was screaming at my front door. Is that MM CO2 had anything to do with it at all.

But even for the sake of argument, this scientific miracle did happen and all my own old A level Physics Chemistry and Biology books turned out to be completely bogus.

NOTHING on the entire planet or any other including GOD almighty herself transcending from the clouds with Al Gore at his right side would force me to believe there is anything myself or you could do to stop it or even slow it down, one tiny little bit.

However even if this did happen which I do not for one second think it would. If Al Gore did turn up on anythings right arm it sure will not be any nice God I would bow to.

It still begs the question. Whether or not we should get shot of the SUV and buy some new more expensive light bulbs.

Because the worlds temperature rising by 5% over even 50 years has happened before will happen again is a good thing not a bad thing anyway.

But even if it were not.

When this race of created monkeys has done its time it has done its time and thats that. Its time to let another higher form of created monkey have another go in a few million years time.

Stop being so full of your own importance. Only crazy people and people that watch too much BBC TV or James Bond movies think that the climate can be controlled in a positive way by anything man inspired. Solving one problem in one place only causes a bigger problem somewhere else.

We are so insignificantly small and pathetically stupid in the great play of the universe, a fact that is self apparent. Maybe its time we all fucked off now and saved ourselves the curtain calls.

If you cant live as a free man in a free world. Then whats the point of living at all?

I have four children SO

No one including me wants to live on a polluted planet. To want to would make one as mad as Al Gore himself. Because please please understand the people who are polluting this world the most dangerously are the people running this scam, not you or me.

AND THEY KNOW IT.

Atlas shrugged and then shrugged again and almost wished he could strangle some people. If not give them a damned good shaking.

16 February 2008 at 01:54  
Anonymous DJ said...

Today, on a whim, I have decided to go around the blogosphere and castigate all those bloggers who describe someone as mentally unstable simply because they disagree with their views.

I take it Your Grace is neither Clinical Psychologist, nor Psychiatrist?

Your grace is behaving as an arse of the first order, its' terribly unbecoming and, might I suggest, a tad unchristian.

Stop this indefensible practice forthwith.

16 February 2008 at 12:14  
Blogger Cranmer said...

Mr/Miss/Mrs/Ms DJ,

It is somewhat presumptuous of you to assume that His Grace is neither a clinical psychologist nor a psychiatrist, and rather naive of you to believe that only membership of either fraternity qualifies one to draw conclusions from symptoms.

Are you a doctor? Quite possibly not, and yet you draw conclusions of illness from symptoms manifest in others. Do not presume to diagnose toothache from a mere ache in a tooth, for only a dentist is qualified to put two and two together, and only he shall make four, for only he is qualified to do so. Do you like Monet? How dare you before consulting someone with a degree in art. What about Beethoven? Do you have a degree in music? Please desist forthwith with your presumptuous opinions until you have submitted your pseudo-knowledge to someone who has real knowledge.

16 February 2008 at 12:27  
Blogger ENGLISHMAN said...

Anonymous,Queenie and the roths ,control approximately 80%of the worlds uranium.

16 February 2008 at 12:53  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My Gods you are are clever bugger Cranmer. He who is not worthy, takes his hat off to you.

I consider myself to be a lay psychologist. It is in fact the way I determine the validity of virtually ever idea I have in my head. I have studied Jungian psychology since I was a teenager, and may I say it has NEVER let me down. Even though I am relatively so thick, I sometimes forget how to even spell psychology.

My mother who left school at 14 yet knows more about people then anyone I have ever known. She could not even tell you who the president of the US is, but could tell you what you are thinking just by looking at you.

This I believe because her head is not full of the propaganda and misinformation that has been propagated in our schools universities and churches for many decades, if not very much longer.

Now we are in the position that the common sense of ordinary people has been systematically DESTROYED as any basis on which to base our existence.

Unfortunately this process started in our churches and has now infected ever department of our lives. The comments from dj are a perfect example of this modern way of thinking. Or should I say not really thinking at all.

My devotion to Jungian thinking may sound like a contradiction, but I do not consider it to be so, for this reason. Jung understood the universe though the individual. However explains it though collective and individual personified visual aspects of the Human imagination. Which is the most it not the only truly wonderful thing about the human spirit and therefore its condition.

In short he is telling us to think for ourselves because it is the only thing tat 'counts' in the end.

It may not be necessary to know ones Jung to understand just about everything that you really need to know about the world. But it dont half help.

So called experts are the most dangerous thing we have on this planet, next to nuclear bombs. In my opinion. This because they have not done the journey but already think they have arrived.

Atlas shrugged, and felt not a little depressed and seriously worried about the future for all of us.

Comments like dj's did not help him to feel any better.

16 February 2008 at 15:12  
Anonymous hear o israel said...

dear anonymous 1.04

if it is a scam then your indifference is quite right , if it is not a scam you have labelled my concern as self importance quite wrongly .

you seem only too complicit to agree with the madness. if it is not your fight then fair enough but things can be done to mitigate the worst of the change .

i still maintain that to rubbish my belief in global heating you need to offer a rival theory that debunks it .

for the moment it appears the theory is right .

16 February 2008 at 17:57  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wouldn't dream of commenting on HRH's mental state, but suggesting that the EU is a force for good re climate change does beggar belief.
Until they sort out the ridiculous shuffling of sessions between Strasbourg & Brussels and all the resulting environmental damage they can't be taken seriously

16 February 2008 at 22:06  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear hear o Israel

Try to keep up if you had read my comments properly you would know that I am ATLAS.

As such I do not want my burden messed up any more then you do.

Which is why I do not trust anyone that claims to want my job. They must be mad for wanting it, and therefore must only have very evil motives for so doing. Which please believe me, they very much do.

The evil of which I speak is to control the hearts bodies mind prosperity and most of all spirit of the common man. A trick that is not modern, original or good least of all scientific, in any way shape of form.

Read your bible properly not Neo-Marxism/fascism made simple for the almost brain dead. In the form of modern educational text books. They are propaganda paid for and published by, our worst possible enemies. OUR OWN RULING CLASS.

I predict that as soon as they have your cash the planet will suddenly cool down, and they will take the credit. Our ruling class will then find another scam to rob you of you cash liberty prosperity and free will, almost by the next day.

I would safely bet the house on it.

In fact if you had read my comments on other sites you would know I already have, and made a proverbial killing.( by the way its called a killing for a reason )

ATLAS shrugged very hard indeed. But the bloody thing refuses to move.

17 February 2008 at 06:46  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How the Antimessiah will be Assassinated

Several years ago, when I began to speak publicly about Prince Charles and the prophecies of the antimessiah, I was confronted by some who just couldn't see it that way. They didn't understand the number thing or get it about the coat-of-arms. In fact, of all the complaints I have ever heard directed against me or the ministry, it has stemmed from this subject.

Some critics just can't imagine, mild mannered, meek, geeky Prince Charles having the necessary fiber to be a world leader let alone the feared and mighty antimessiah. I rarely get to discuss this objection face to face. When I do, I remind them that Hitler was a corporal in WWI and his wimpy style didn't stop him from leading the world in WWII which killed 50 million people including six million Jews. Yeshua refers to the antimessiah as the son of perdition (destruction) because he will kill more people than anyone in the world has ever come close to killing.

One of my critics on this subject was a pastor of a large church. Several of his folks had heard my information on this topic and had enthusiastically shared it with him. He was unimpressed, and in an effort to discredit me offered the following, trying to say no one will know who the antimessiah is. "If I knew who the antichrist was in the world. I'd do God a big favor and get a gun. I'd go and shoot him in the head," so the pastor said before the chuckles of the church. The really ironic thing is someone is prophesied to do what he said.

The prophecy says that the antimessiah will be assassinated prior to him coming to power.

And I saw one of his heads as if it had been slain, and his fatal wound was healed. And the whole earth was amazed and followed after the beast; REV 13:

And he exercises all the authority of the first beast in his presence. And he makes the earth and those who dwell in it to worship the first beast, whose fatal wound was healed. REV 13:12

And he deceives those who dwell on the earth because of the signs which it was given him to perform in the presence of the beast, telling those who dwell on the earth to make an image to the beast who had the wound of the sword and has come to life. REV 13:14

Revelation speaks of the antimessiah as having had a fatal head wound. The antimessiah's counterpart (the false prophet) is to assist in reviving the antimessiah. Political assassination is something this generation is well aware of. From the Kennedy's to Martin Luther King, to Sadat and Rabin, we are very aware of how assassination news travels and is regarded. Can you imagine an assassination that results in a resurrection? This is what the prophecy says about the antimessiah. Whether this produces additional public support or not is debatable, but the prophecy relates to it each time the false prophet promotes the beast. But, it won't be a complete healing... The prophet Zechariah says there will be some residual effects from the wound. Apparently, he will be blind in his right eye and his right arm will not work either.

Woe to the worthless shepherd who leaves the flock! A sword will be on his arm and on his right eye! His arm will be totally withered, and his right eye will be blind. ZEC 11:17

In conclusion, I have been asked many times if Prince Charles knows who he is. That is, if he is the antimessiah, does he know that he is. My answer is Yes. I believe that the antimessiah is patiently waiting for his time just as the Messiah waited for His. I believe he is trusting in the promise that was given by his father.

I will give you all this domain and its glory; for it has been handed over to me, and I give it to whomever I wish. Therefore if you worship before me, it shall all be yours. LUK 4:7

Am I afraid of what Prince Charles might do with me identifying him? Nope. I'm small potatoes in this world. I'm just the "him" who did the calculation. "Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast...

22 November 2008 at 08:12  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How the Antimessiah Comes to Power

How the antimessiah comes to power and is given the authority to rule for 42 months are some of the most specific prophecies of him. Let's examine what the prophet Zechariah says as he compares the antimessiah to the evil shepherd.

Thus says the Lord my God, "Pasture the flock doomed to slaughter. Those who buy them slay them and go unpunished, and each of those who sell them says, >Blessed be the Lord, for I have become rich!' And their own shepherds have no pity on them. For I shall no longer have pity on the inhabitants of the land," declares the Lord; "but behold, I shall cause the men to fall, each into another's power and into the power of his king; and they will strike the land, and I shall not deliver them from their power." ZEC 11:4-6

The first step of the antimessiah coming to power is us losing control of our own national sovereignty. This prophecy says that we lose control of our own selves and then we are given over into the power of our own ruler. Our own ruler will then give his power (control of us) to the antimessiah. With each succeeding step of globalization, emergency government powers, and internal security requirements, our personal freedoms are inching their way toward capitulation. With the recent September 11 attack, congress has enacted legislation that has increased the power of government and decreased the privacy of people. I understand the reasons and agree with what has to be done. I also understand that this is the same process described by the prophets.

So I pastured the flock doomed to slaughter, hence the afflicted of the flock. And I took for myself two staffs: the one I called Favor, and the other I called Union; so I pastured the flock. Then I annihilated the three shepherds in one month, for my soul was impatient with them, and their soul also was weary of me. Then I said, AI will not pasture you. What is to die, let it die, and what is to be annihilated, let it be annihilated; and let those who are left eat one another's flesh." And I took my staff, Favor, and cut it in pieces, to break my covenant which I had made with all the peoples. So it was broken on that day, and thus the afflicted of the flock who were watching me realized that it was the word of the Lord. Then I cut my second staff, Union, in pieces, to break the brotherhood between Judah and Israel. ZEC 11:7-11,14

The antimessiah comes to power under two staffs called Union and Favor. The actual rise to power is in the midst of ten kings by uprooting three of them. According to the prophecy, the antimessiah will be impatient with the three and they will be weary of him. The remaining seven will give their power to him.

This description is not of a powerful handsome leader who sweeps everyone off their feet. It is better described as the political intrigue of our day. The present European Union is simply referred to as the Union. Those nations who have agreed upon the Euro Dollar are said to have received Favor. The power that the antimessiah will be given and wield is economic — the very aim and purpose of the European Union.

As for the ten horns, out of this kingdom ten kings will arise; and another will arise after them, and he will be different from the previous ones and will subdue three kings. DAN 7:24

Prince Charles is not an elected official as the rulers of the European Union; he is a monarch. Therefore, as the prophecy says, he is different from them. Maybe you are wondering if Prince Charles has any interest in leading Europe? He does. He tried to influence the original definition of the ECM in its formation in 1992. He argued that the monarchy was the most stable form of government, but Europe was into democracy and they turned him down. But the prophecy says they will consider his offer when they become a group of ten kings.

And the ten horns which you saw are ten kings, who have not yet received a kingdom, but they receive authority as kings with the beast for one hour. REV 17:12

There are two competing models for the definition of world globalism. One is the UN model and the other European. The UN wants one great big community of everyone helping everyone. The European model divides the world into three parts: developed nations, developing nations, and undeveloped nations. The European model contends that there are not enough resources in the world for all nations to be developed and, therefore, part of the world needs to be sacrificed to meet the need of the other part. The European model also contends that there is not enough food to go around and the world population should be significantly reduced. There are six billion people right now; they think two billion would be a better number. The language of Zechariah suggests that the antimessiah will be the guy who leads the world while a large number of people die from starvation and lack of resources. Prince Charles is a globalist. He is the leading proponent of the European
model.

Present rumblings out of Europe with the advent of the Euro Dollar and its currency is calling for a new definition for the European Council of Ministers and the authority that its President should have. Speculation is running that the new definition and powers should be accomplished as early as 2002 or more likely 2003. March or April of 2003 would be a fascinating time for the ten ruler committee to formulate and implement these ideas. Seven rulers, each with six months to rule, could give their power to one man. Seven times six equals forty-two months to rule. The prophecy is very specific that we will know that he has the full forty-two months on the day he begins to rule.

22 November 2008 at 08:13  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The prophet Daniel offers this intriguing element about the antimessiah.

And he [antimessiah] will show no regard for the gods of his fathers or for the desire of women, nor will he show regard for any other god; for he will magnify himself above them all. DAN 11:37

Prince Charles in recent years has caused some concern for his decision to change one of his titles. The title in question is "Defender of the Faith." He has changed it to say, ADefender of Faiths." His rationale is that he wants all of his subjects to identify with him, not just the Christians. This is a major departure from the past. The King of Great Britain is in the position of being head of the church (in opposition to the Pope). Prince Charles apparently does not regard the god of his fathers.

The next phrase of the prophecy says, "no regard... for the desire of women." When Charles married Lady Diana, many prophecy teachers dismissed Charles as the antimessiah candidate on this alone. They need to examine this prophecy a bit more. It is Diana that uniquely qualifies Charles for this prophecy.

There are two ways to regard the prophecy "no desire for women." One is from the homosexual standpoint. The Biblical expression "no desire for women" generally means there is instead a desire for men. Prince Charles, just prior to marrying Lady Diana, was fending off hints and suggestions that he was homosexual. These rumors persisted even after his marriage. However, Stephen Barry, the eleven-year personal valet for Prince Charles wrote a book entitled In His Royal Service that quelled these rumors. Stephen Barry asserted, as his personal valet, he could verify that Prince Charles was all man and that these rumors were simply that — rumors. He, himself, offered his own personal witness that Prince Charles was heterosexual and that he had assisted in some arranged meetings with other ladies. Everyone pretty much accepted Stephen's testimony until he died of AIDS three years after leaving Prince Charles employment. It was obvious that Stephen Barry was,
himself, homosexual.

But it is the secondary meaning of "no regard... for the desire of women" that brings Diana into the picture more clearly. A more modern translation would read, "He will have no regard for the most desirable among women." The word "desire" is an adjective of women, not a verb for the antimessiah. "No regard" is the verb for the antimessiah.

This brings us to the special role of Diana in Charles life. Without any doubt, the world regarded Princess Diana as one of the most desirable women in the world. This is the woman that Prince Charles said publicly, AI have no desire for her." Additionally, you may recall that Diana is the ancient name of a goddess worshiped by the Romans. There are a number of mythological symbols and stories and that meld into this entire scenario. Prince Charles' marriage and relationship with Diana did not disqualify him in this prophecy; it uniquely qualified him.

22 November 2008 at 08:14  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

His Calling Card

And I saw a beast coming up out of the sea, having ten horns and seven heads, and on his horns were ten diadems, and on his heads were blasphemous names. And the beast which I saw was like a leopard, and his feet were like those of a bear, and his mouth like the mouth of a lion. And the dragon gave him his power and his throne and great authority. REV 13:1-2

Symbols and symbolic language frighten most readers of Bible prophecy. Who knows what the symbols mean? From an interpretative standpoint, the fear is that anything can fit any symbol by anyone with enough effort. But for most, the real mistake works like this. If the symbol seems good; it must be about us. If it seems bad; it must be about our enemies. Mutant creatures with "ten horns and seven heads" and a "beast" made of different body parts must be bad, right? So, most folks lay a heavy value judgment on it and begin adapting it to their preconceptions.

The writer of the Revelation says he saw something. Most prophecy teachers claim that this is symbolic and want to offer their preferred meanings to the symbols. What if they are wrong and it is not symbolic at all? What if it is something actually seen and it has been there in front of us for years? What if it is something viewed as honorable in our world and just a common thing?

When you meet a prominent or important person, you will receive their card. It is called a business card. It has the correct spelling of the person's name, their position and company name, along with address, phone number, e-mail address, and fax number. This is the common way you meet a person. However, when you meet Prince Charles of Wales, his business card is full of symbols. It is called his coat-of-arms. This set of symbols is reserved strictly for him and is controlled by the college of heraldry. It is his ancient calling card..

The coat-of-arms for Prince Charles is full of history and great meaning. It is the ancient way of identifying the royal families originating from the Holy Roman Empire. Refer to the diagram showing the coat-of-arms of Prince Charles.

I don't have sufficient space to explain all the meanings in his coat-of-arms, but I do want you to take note of the "heraldic beast" and the "dragon" in it. The beast is a composite creature depicting the past: the body is that of a leopard, the feet are from a bear, and the head (mouth) is that of a lion. The past emperors of the Roman empire were from France (leopard), Germany (bear), and England (lion). This is the definition of the Heraldic Beast from the college of heraldry and its has existed for the past 500 years. It also matches the exact description as seen by the Apostle John in the book of Revelation.

The dragon comes from the flag of Wales. Prince Charles of Wales is more than just a name. It is the title of the heir apparent — the next in line for kingship. The red dragon dates back to the ancient Romans. Britannia was the head of the western Roman Empire and the symbol of Roman antiquity was a red dragon. It is also the symbol that was seen by John to give the beast his power, throne, and great authority. The day that Prince Charles received his title as the Prince of Wales and his named officially changed to Prince Charles of Wales, he was surrounded by banners of this red dragon at a castle in Wales. This is why his coat-of-arms depicts the symbol in a supporting role. There is much more that could be said but time and space prohibit it further. Should you wish to delve more into his other symbols, I recommend the book, The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea, by Tim Cohen. Lion and Lamb Ministries offers this book. What you will discover is that
every symbol in the coat-of-arms lines up with the Scripture. Is it an incredible coincidence or did John see and warn us?

Before we leave all these symbols lets address the kingdom symbolized by the ten horns and seven heads. And I saw a beast coming up out of the sea, having ten horns and seven heads, and on his horns were ten diadems, and on his heads were blasphemous names. First, let's let the Bible explain the meaning of the ten horns and seven heads.

Here is the mind which has wisdom.. The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits, and they are seven kings; five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come; and when he comes, he must remain a little while. And the beast which was and is not, is himself also an eighth, and is one of the seven, and he goes to destruction. And the ten horns which you saw are ten kings, who have not yet received a kingdom, but they receive authority as kings with the beast for one hour. These have one purpose and they give their power and authority to the beast. REV 17:9-13

Just like Revelation 13:18, these prophecies require some wisdom to properly understand. First, let's clear up the obvious. The seven mountains are a reference to Rome. The kingdom of the beast (antimessiah) will originate from Rome — the ancient Holy Roman Empire. The woman is a reference to the false bride of the Messiah (the false church). Everyone is aware that the Christian (Catholic) church is headquartered in Rome. I know, I know, you are all thinking that it doesn't represent us good Christians (us protestant types). However, Protestant means protesting Catholic. So, it is the headquarters of the Christian church. It also is the parliamentary headquarters for the European Union [Ed.: now in Brussels].

The reference to seven past kings (five have fallen, one is, and the other not yet come who remains a short while) is a historic description of the Holy Roman Empire. There have been seven Charles' as Emperors of the Holy Roman Empire. World Book Encyclopedia and other reference documents summarize the history of the Holy Roman Empire by these seven kings. This is a historical fact. But what makes this prophecy such a puzzle is its reference to the beast being "also an eighth, and is one of the seven." The answer is simple and right before us. They all have the name Charles — Prince Charles will be the eighth when he rules over the ancient Holy Roman Empire (the modern European Union). How is he one of the seven? He is a direct descendant of the Charles VI through the Hapsburg line.

So we have seven ancient kings that depict the ancient Holy Roman Empire, what are the ten kings that rule with the beast for one hour?

The modern European Union was formed in 1993 and is made up of fifteen European nations. It has a parliament in Brussels. It has a Judiciary. It has an Executive called the European Council of Ministers (ECM) with fifteen rulers. It has formed its own currency and dollar. It has its own flag.

The new Euro Dollar has transformed Europe in a host of ways. They have gone way beyond the original idea of a common market. The EU is well on its way to becoming an economic powerhouse. However, not everyone of the fifteen EU nations have signed up for this Euro Dollar. Some are not economically strong enough to join the club and some want to hold onto their own money. For example, the United Kingdom doesn't want to give up their pound sterling. Therefore, a controversy is brewing within the ECM (council of ministers). This executive function is to serve like our Federal Reserve (controlling the money). The EU does not want rulers from other European countries having a say about the Euro Dollar if they aren't signed up for it. So, the ECM is preparing to shrink in number accordingly (possibly ten or eleven). If this is the set of ten kings spoken of in the prophecy, then it will be ten not eleven.

Now this is the really interesting part. Each of these ministers in the ECM get to have the power to rule for six months each on a rotating basis. Each minister takes his turn serving as President. However, this power sharing routine is not working. With only six months, there isn't enough time to really carry out any long term plans. The common complaint of retiring Presidents is that more time should be given to the person in this office. The suggestion has been made that one person be given the power to rule more on the order of the U.S. President (a four-year term of office). I'll discuss more of this when we look at the prophecies of how the antimessiah comes to power.

22 November 2008 at 08:15  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

He was born in 1948, the same year that Israel became a modern nation. He is a prince of the ancient people who came and destroyed the temple in Jerusalem — the Romans. His lineage chart traces to every great world leader including King David; he is referred to as the "son of David." His name can be calculated to the numerical value of 666 by the ancient Hebrew method in both English and Hebrew. His calling card visually presents the composite beast made from the body of a leopard, the feet of a bear, and the mouth of a lion. His power, throne, and great authority have been given to him by a red dragon. He wants to lead the European Union (the ancient Roman Empire) and have dominion over all nations. His name is Prince Charles of Wales. He is the leading candidate to be the prophesied antimessiah.

When Satan made his second temptation offer to Messiah Yeshua, he offered the world in all its glory.

And he [the devil] led Him [Yeshua] up and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. And the devil said to Him, "I will give You all this domain and its glory; for it has been handed over to me, and I give it to whomever I wish. Therefore if You worship before me, it shall all be Yours." LUK 4:5-7

Yeshua turned down the offer of the devil to worship him as God. However, someone else is prophesied to accept the devil's offer. He is called the antimessiah (antichrist). Yeshua called him the son of perdition (destruction). He will come not to do the will of God but of himself. He will not have power of his own, but he will have influence and others will give their power to him. The Scriptures say that all the leaders of the world will commit adultery (get in bed) with him. He will be the false shepherd leading the world to a three and half year time period known as the Great Tribulation.

Bible students and prophecy speakers have all wanted to know who he is. The antimessiah is the second most prominent person prophesied to come after the Messiah Himself. Identifying the antimessiah, seeing him in your lifetime means two great things: the end of the age Great Tribulation (the last three and one half years) is soon coming, and the Messiah is coming right after to usher in His Kingdom. The Scriptures say that the antimessiah will come to power and rule for 42 months. It also says that his kingdom will be destroyed by the coming of the Messiah. Identifying the antimessiah is one of the most intriguing puzzles in end time Bible prophecy.

Some prophecy enthusiasts say it can't be done; i.e., no one can identify the antimessiah. Some say that we will be raptured before he emerges. Others tag every public leader in the world as him. Remember when Henry Kissinger was said to be the antichrist because of his statement "Peace is at hand" at the end of the Vietnam war. If you made the letter AA" equal six and then added six to each succeeding letter (B equals 12, C equals 18, etc.), then "Kissinger" equaled 666.

Or, how about Ronald Wilson Reagan (each name has six letters each). Or how about William Jefferson Clinton, whose transliterated name in Hebrew equaled 666 by the gematria. And then there was Bob Dole, his crippled right arm from a war injury seemed to match the antichrist prophecy of a withered right arm. There have been a host of other candidates for antichrist: President George Bush, the Pope, Russian leaders, the Secretary General of the UN, the list goes on and on.. In prior generations, everyone knew that Hitler was it. So if someone says, "Hey, did you know Prince Charles of Wales is the antichrist," why should anyone give serious attention to them?

Let's be honest. If you go to another believer (with any prophecy interest) and suggest that Prince Charles is the antichrist, then he will accept your idea right along with UFO alien abductions, one world conspiracy warnings of the illuminati, a hot internet rumor about some girl who dated a terrorist just before the attack, investing in gold coins, long-term storage of wheat in buckets, and the cow jumping over the moon. If the person you speak with has no interest whatsoever in end time prophecy, your suggestion of Prince Charles as the antichrist will confirm his worst suspicions of you being just plain "nuts." He will end the conversation with a cock-eyed look and the words, "Oh really. I need to go now." Further, saying Prince Charles IS the antichrist is outright slander and one of the most despicable things you can say of any public figure.

But aren't you saying that Prince Charles of Wales is the antimessiah in this article? No. I'm saying that he fits more identifying prophecies about the antimessiah than any other person in history. When and if Prince Charles receives the prophesied 42 months to rule, then we can proclaim it to everyone. All doubt will have been removed. By the way, that's the reason for this article. It appears that the European Union is contemplating some changes in their executive leadership and Prince Charles just might make a very interesting move into its leadership. Of course, there are some other prophecies that need to be met as well, but it is not inconceivable for all of these events to transpire soon. Before we examine what might be, let's examine what is already known about Prince Charles and review some of the identifying prophecies of the antimessiah.

The Number of His Name

Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six. REV 13:18

This is one of the most fascinating and intriguing verses in all prophetic Scripture. This verse has caused more Bible teachers and students to chase their tails than any other verse. How do you calculate the number? Obviously, each letter must have a numerical value, but what value is correct for each letter?

The answer to these questions comes from an understanding of the ancient classic languages of Hebrew and Greek. As you may recall, the numbers we use today are Arabic or Roman numerals. Like Hebrew and Greek, English has no numerals of their own. In ancient times, before there were Arabic and Roman numerals, a simple decimal system was used for each letter. That is, the first ten letters were given the value of one through ten in ascending order. The next letter, however, was not an eleven, but instead, twenty. Thereafter, each letter was ten more (20, 30, 40, etc). At one hundred, the letter incremented by 100's, (200, 300, 400, etc). Both Hebrew and Greek contain 22 letters. So, the greatest value of any letter (Tav in Hebrew, Omega in Greek) was 400. The ancients simply used letters in place of numbers to indicate numerical values.

Archaeology has found, for example, where a man etched a secret message in stone by saying, AI love the girl whose name equals 545." It is a very simple system and can easily be adapted to English as well.

When John wrote his prophecy giving the value of 666 to the name of the beast (antimessiah), the ancients had no difficulty understanding the intent. This would be a confirmation of a particular name and would help in the identification process. The key word calculate also adds to the mystery as it is more technical than the simpler word "count." The word "number" in the Greek is "arithmos." The origins of the word "arithmetic." To sum it up (excuse the pun), this verse of Scripture emphasizes that wisdom and understanding must be employed to draw a proper conclusion. Here is wisdom.. Let him who has understanding...

In 1982, I purchased my first personal desktop computer. It was a giant calculator. Since I was Hebrew, I also knew how the letters represented certain values. I was also a writer and aware of the origins of our English letters and language out of the ancient languages. For example, the first Hebrew letter is an aleph, Greek is alpha, and English is just plain "A" The English alphabet originates from Greek (alpha beta) and the Hebrew (aleph bet). I was curious as to whether the gematria (numerical values for each letter) would yield any interesting results.

With the help of a friend more adept in computer programming, we wrote a computer program that would calculate the numerical value (gematria) for English. I limited the system only to the first 22 letters as the ancients had done (Hebrew and Greek only have 22 letters). Once the program was written, I was able to type in all the names for all world figures past and present, calculating the gematria for each with computer accuracy. I had no expectation whatsoever for anyone when I started entering names. I already knew Kissinger wasn't the antichrist.

Then it happened. I entered the name "Prince Charles of Wales". The value displayed was 666. Have you ever heard of an experience called, "tunnel vision." It is a real thing. My mind focused so hard that my vision contracted to an area limited to the numbers themselves. I thought I was passing out. No matter how many times I entered the name, the calculation was the same. Then it hit me. He is a Prince just as the Scripture says.

Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and have nothing, and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. And its end will come with a flood; even to the end there will be war; desolations are determined. DAN 9:26

The prince who is to come must be of Roman origin. It was the Romans who came and destroyed the temple and Jerusalem. The antimessiah must come from the fourth great beast described by Daniel — the Romans. Daniel later describes how the prince comes to power. He must do so while being a prince, not a king.

And in his place a despicable person will arise, on whom the honor of kingship has not been conferred, but he will come in a time of tranquility and seize the kingdom by intrigue. DAN 11:21

Prince Charles is a prince of the people who came and destroyed the temple and Jerusalem. The honor of kingship has not been conferred upon him and his name equals 666 in English (the common language of our world) using the ancient gematria method.

But that's not good enough for me, I'm Hebrew. I need to see his name in Hebrew calculated to the gematria. For that I had to go to Israel and find an authoritative source for translating his name into Hebrew. I ended up following how the Israeli press writes his name in the Hebrew newspapers. "Nasich Charles Mem Wales" is the name as pronounced in Hebrew. Refer to the chart shown here and you can compare the English and Hebrew names with the corresponding calculations. The statistical odds are astonishing. The name "Prince Charles of Wales" in the modern accepted form of Hebrew calculates to 666 as well.

Let me remind you of a childhood story that will illustrate how astonishing this fact is. Remember, the story of Robin Hood and the archery contest? First, an arrow is shot at a great distance striking the bulls-eye on the target. This is what the first calculation of Prince Charles to the English adaptation of the ancient gematria. Next, Robin Hood shot his arrow splitting the first arrow into the bulls-eye. This is the second calculation of Prince Charles translated into Hebrew and then calculated to the same value.

You won't have any name of another public figure in the world whose name equals 666 in English or Hebrew. Nor, can you find another name of anyone in the world whose English name equals one value, translate it then into Hebrew and calculate to the same value as before the translation. I think this one fact about Prince Charles makes him worthy of much greater observation.

Consider this also. Charles means "man" or "manly." Revelation 13:18 says that the number 666 is that of a "man." I could substitute the name Charles for the word "man" and it would mean the same.

Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for the number is that of a [Charles]; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six. REV 13:18

22 November 2008 at 08:16  
Blogger sexy said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

14 January 2009 at 07:29  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Newer›  ‹Older