Abortion: the largest cause of death in Europe
So asks the Archbishop of Canterbury.
As the Government's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill is debated in detail in the House of Commons, they shall consider ‘saviour siblings’, and animal/human hybrid embryos. And some shall ask why ‘religious bigots’ should seek to impose their irrational views on the enlightened part of society, while those of a religious hue (joined undoubtedly by many concerned non-believers) shall ask why science presumes to instruct legislators and dispense with the conscience.
Dr Williams asserts: ‘Conscientious objections about the Bill are not a matter of blind superstition. They arise from serious concerns about where the direction of some sorts of research might lead society. "Slippery slope" arguments don't settle the question, but they can't be ignored. And I, for one, am grateful that both scientists and politicians are willing to recognise there is a serious debate to be had on these matters of conscience, and more is at stake than just a set of irrational prejudices.”
The Archbishop also notes ‘the pressure from some quarters to take this opportunity to reduce the time limits for abortion’.
And this is to be a very interesting battle, and one which is worthy of cross-party support. But in the blue corner is Nadine Dorries MP with her demand for a reduction to 20 weeks, and in the red corner is a Labour counter-amendment, demanding a reduction to 22 weeks. Never has a division on a point of morality assured such mutual destruction, and it is madness. One might think, if Labour members were really concerned with this, that they would have supported the Dorries amendment, but no. They have made the issue party political, seeking to bring in their own (much less effective) amendment, and a house divided against itself cannot stand.
And this comes amidst a report that establishes that there is a marital breakdown and an abortion in Europe almost every 30 seconds:
‘Marriage and birth rates are falling dramatically, pensioners now outnumber teenagers, and more and more people are living alone, says the Institute for family policy in a survey of life in the 27 EU countries.’
And perversely ‘one in every five pregnancies ends in abortion’, which amounts to 1.2 million a year - equivalent to the population of Slovenia. This makes abortion the largest single cause of death in Europe.
And so almost one million (920,089) fewer babies were born in the 27 EU countries last year than in 1980. There are six million more over-65s than under-14s in Europe, compared with 36 million more children than pensioners in 1980.
And this demographic time-bomb is suffixed with the observation that ‘the fact that the number of EU inhabitants has increased at all is largely due to immigration’. It transpires that ‘84 per cent of population growth in 2000-2007 is attributable to arrivals from beyond EU borders’.
And one wonders why there are concerns that the EU has passed a resolution announcing that children have a 'right' to abortion (or rather 'sexual and reproductive health and family planning education and services') and that this 'must' be an 'integral part of thje future EU strategy on the rights of the child'.
One wonders if there is any point expending energy in opposing the EU, for it is clearly intent on its own self-destruction.