Monday, May 05, 2008

How Gordon Brown really went down in the USA

In today’s Daily Telegraph is a tediously boring article explaining how Prime Minister Brown intends ‘to refocus on food and homes’. He appears not to have a clue about economics, the free market, or even wisely-apportioned compassion. It is all predictable leftish waffle, principally aimed at shoring up Jacqui Smith’s slender majority, and also those of numerous other Labour MPs who are facing redundancy.

But a communicant has drawn Cranmer’s attention to an excellent comment by one Mr Paul Wilcox, who offers real insight into how Mr Brown was really received in the United States. Food and homes are ‘not the issues that are important’, he says, because ‘the US press have Brown sussed out precisely’:

It's a good thing that British Prime Minister Gordon Brown's U.S. visit was upstaged by the dramatic reception Americans gave Pope Benedict XVI. Brown might have been booed if he hadn't delivered what aides called his "signature" speech within the cloistered walls of Harvard's Kennedy Center.

Brown's tedious, hour-long speech impudently demanded that we issue a "Declaration of Interdependence" in order to submit to global governance. That's another way of calling on us to repeal our Declaration of Independence.

No thanks for the advice, Mr. Brown. Brave Americans rose up and rejected Britain's royalist rule in 1776, and we've gotten along mighty well without transatlantic interference in our government for more than two centuries. We certainly don't want to reinstate any foreign supervision today.

The redundancy of Brown's outrageous semantics was oppressive. His speech used the word global 69 times, globalization 7 times, and interdependence 13 times. He referred to Kennedy 19 times, lavishing fulsome praise on John F. ("his influence abides everywhere"), Robert (he sent forth "ripples of hope"), and Ted ("one of the greatest Senators in more than two centuries").

Brown rejected the traditional concept of national sovereignty, which means an independent nation not subservient to any outside control, telling us to replace it with "responsible sovereignty," which he defined as accepting what he calls our global "obligations." Hold on to your pocketbook.

Brown admitted that his "main argument" is that we must accept "new global rules," "new global institutions," and "global networks." Brown's global rules include massive U.S. cash handouts and opening U.S. borders to the world.

Brown's use of well-known American political phrases was tacky. He tried to morph FDR's New Deal into a "New Global Deal," and JFK's New Frontier into "the New Frontier is that there is no frontier."

Brown even slipped in an attempt at thought control: "Americans must learn to think inter-continentally." He declaimed, "We are all internationalists now."

Using the rhetorical device of inevitability, Brown warned us that his vision of the globalist future is "irreversible transformation." He wants to "transcend states" and "transcend borders" as he builds the "architecture of a global society."

Brown peddled the nonsense that the peoples of the world "subscribe to similar ideals." He tried to tell us that all religions (Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists) have "common values" and "similar ideals." No, they certainly do not.

Brown wants to increase the power of the United Nations to become the source of "an international stand-by capacity of trained civilian experts, ready to go anywhere at any time," and even be able to exercise "military force." Americans do not intend to cede such authority to the corrupt UN.

The silliest part of Brown's ponderous speech was his claim that "a global society" is "advancing democracy widely across the world." In fact, he doesn't even practice democracy in his own country.

Brown refused to allow the British people to vote on whether or not they want to accept the European Union (EU) constitution. He acquiesced in the plot of the constitution's author, Valery Giscard d'Estaing, to put the EU constitution into effect by calling it a treaty so it did not have to be voted on by the people.

Brown was chicken about the treaty subterfuge and did not permit a photographic record of his participation. He sent his Foreign Secretary to perform the official treaty signing in front of cameras.

The EU constitution, now called the Treaty of Lisbon, requires all signers to surrender their sovereignty and democracy to unelected bureaucrats in Brussels and judges in Strasbourg. The EU constitution takes away England's right to pass its own laws, forces England to surrender more than 60 UK vetoes of EU decisions, and gives the EU bureaucracy and tribunals total control over England's immigration policy.

Instead of a self-governing nation whose democratic system was developed over centuries, England is now ruled by what Margaret Thatcher called "the paper pushers in Brussels."

Brown made his globalism speech emphatic by repeatedly invoking the words "New World Order." The New World Order Brown tries to con the United States into accepting would mean taxing Americans for foreign handouts so immense they would make the Marshall Plan look puny, global warming rules to drastically reduce our standard of living, and putting American workers in a common labor pool with the world's billions who subsist on less than $2 a day.

Gordon Brown invited us to march forward to globalism "where there is no path." He's correct that there is no path on which we can expect globalism to lead us to a better world; in fact every path toward global government is a surrender of our liberty and our prosperity.

Gordon Brown should go back home and study up on how Americans refused to accept orders from King George III.


This is a most excellent debunking of a patronising and utterly pretentious speech, which must leave Americans wondering why Labour politically assassinated Tony Blair. But the phrase ‘New World Order’ is one that readers and communicants will hear again and again, whoever is in power in the UK, for it is teleologically inescapable.

The nations of the world are ready to surrender their kingdoms to any man who will offer a solution to the problems of the world - the real ones and the fabricated ones. All he needs is ‘sufficient stature to hold the allegiance of all the people and to lift us up out of the economic morass into which we are sinking’. Stature, charisma, compassion, credibility, experience, political skill, spirituality, a global profile – that man is not Gordon Brown, but Gordon Brown knows who it is.

32 Comments:

Anonymous mickey said...

Your Grace,

When people don't know where they are going, they look for the company of like-minded souls and think that, by so doing, there will be a purpose to the journey. These are the words of Mickey and all should take note. A new sun is rising in the East and for Gordon Brown and the next President of the United States of America, this will herald the new age of the Kowtow!

Presuming, of course, that the current President does not initiate a nuclear conflagration in the meantime!!

5 May 2008 at 10:36  
Anonymous Voyager said...

Brown is a Marxist - Thatcher was an Anti-Marxist who emulated the Marxists and thus we have the problems of Britain being force-fitted into the ideological template of Karl Marx and Antonio Gramsci as filtered through Herbert Marcuse.

The ideological tone of Brown's rallying cry to the like-minded is simply that the voting public are to be coralled into collective farms and kulaks dispensed with. Whatever high-flown rhetoric he uses to hide his arrogant disdain for Self-Determination and Individual Liberty the result is simply the power of The Party as the Vanguard - it is certainly Marxist even if not yet fully Leninist because the public cannot be driven to give absolute power to the dross that purports to lead the nation.

The forces of Nationalism have been rendered somnolent by the demographic drift towards middle-age and a low European birthrate supplanted by a dramatic rise in immigrant birthrates leading to a Pan-Islamic Ummah to transcend nation states.

We forget too quickly that Adolf Hitler was a Pan-European and not a nationalist - he was Austrian not German and wanted to unitre German-language speakers and related groups under a new banner which transcended the borders of the German State of 1913....and his references to the Teutonic Knights shows just how far his fanciful notions of Pan-Europeanism went....for his Waffen-SS were to be the latterday Teutonic Knights ridding Europe of anything but an attachment to bloodlines.

The Socialists faced their split between the globalisers like Rosa Luxembourg and the nation-staters like Stalin with Socialism in One Country - Brown has moved onto the Fourth Internationalist track of One World, One Government, One People

5 May 2008 at 10:52  
Blogger Little Black Sambo said...

"That man is not Gordon Brown, but Gordon Brown knows who it is."
You've lost me there, Cranmer. Who is is?

5 May 2008 at 10:53  
Blogger Little Black Sambo said...

I mean, who is it?

5 May 2008 at 10:54  
Blogger Cranmer said...

Mr Little Black Sambo,

You clearly have not been paying attention.

5 May 2008 at 11:02  
Anonymous mickey said...

Mr Voyager, sir

Thank you for that. But can you answer me this, for you are clearly very much more ejucated that wot i am:

What do we know of Hitler's thinking about Zionism and the Balfour commitment? Was it this, or Rosa Luxemburg et al, that set him off on that terrible path? Are these things discussed, ever?

Sorry, your Grace, that this is off-topic but it is not often that one hears comments as seemingly well informed as Mr Voyager's!!

5 May 2008 at 11:28  
Blogger botogol said...

Here's a
Link to the article (which appears to have been written by Phyllis Schlafly BTW).

Brown is truly dreadful.

When I hear him lecturing foreign countries about democracy (him having become party leader and PM without a vote) I want to curl up in a ball of English embarrassment.

5 May 2008 at 11:40  
Blogger Homophobic Horse said...

"Brown warned us that his vision of the globalist future is "irreversible transformation." He wants to "transcend states" and "transcend borders" as he builds the "architecture of a global society."

Oh look, that explains his immigration policy.

Did you know Gordon Brown is a gnostic?

All this has been seen in advance, allow me to communicate to you some extracts from "Orthodoxy and the Religion of the Future" by Fr. Seraphim Rose:

"The goals of the New-Age include a "convergence of religions" in tandem with a "confluence" of political and economic forces toward World Government. The plan for a New World Order would include a universal credit system, a universal tax, a global police force, and an international authority that would control the worlds food supply and transportation systems."

"All forms of Discrimination would cease, and peoples' allegiance to tribe or nation will be replaced by a planetary conciousness"

"It should be pointed out that many New-Agers today would not be aware of, much less subscribe to, all the point of "The Plan". As we have seen, the movement incorporates a diverse array of groups, ideas and practices. If it can be called a "conspiracy", this is certainly not because all New Agers are working together secretly, o an organizational level, toward fulfilllment of "The Plan". Ultimately, "The Plan" is being orchestrated not on a human but on a demonic level, and the architects of the New Age movement are, to a large degree, only mouthpieces of ideas that are not their own"

"Alice Bailey [a UN ideologue] in the 1940s wrote: "the expressed aims and efforts of the United Nations will be eventually brought to fruition, and a new church of God, gathered out of all religions and spiritual groups, will unitedly bring to an end the great heresy of separateness"

"William Swing, Episcopal Bishop of California and founder/director of the United Religions Initiative, expressed it in his book The Coming United Religions: "The time comes ... when common language and a common purpose for all religions and spiritual movements must be discerned and agreed upon. Merely respecting and understanding other religions is not enough."

On Denatured Christianity: "Although not all globalists share the specifically religious goals, they are certainly united in their view of what kind of religion will not fit into the one-world system they are working to create. Conservative, traditional adherents of a religion, who believe that their religion is a unique fulfilment of the fullness of the truth, will not be welcome in the "global village". As Paul Chaffe, board member of the United religions Initiative, said in 1997: "We can't afford fundamentalists in a world this small." The same view was expressed at the 1998 State of the World Forum, Jim Garrison announced: "If my theology is an impediment, than I have to get rid of my theology."

"Also in 1998, this subject was discussed in some detail by one of the more recent ideologues of the "new religious consciousness," Ken Wilber. A popular author whose works have been praised and avidly studied by both former President Clinton and Al Gore, Wilber outlined the agenda that the world must follow in order to combine science with religion, as well as to establish a "Universal Theology" [Global Warming anyone?] which all religions can embrace without losing their outward differences. "Religions" the world over will have to bracket their mythic beliefs," and he cites as examples Moses parting the Red Sea, Christ born of a virgin etc"

"Wilber than says "only those who embrace the new religious consciousness, or who at least bracket their religious beliefs, will survive in the coming global society, which Wilber says will be marked by a "worldcentric" awareness based in "universal pluralism"."

"Unity in Diversity, destroys diversity. If an adherant to a religion believes that all other religions are equal to his own, he can no longer truly hold to that religion; he can no longer be who he is. He becomes a blank - a blank waiting to be filled with a new revelation. There is only sameness based on blankness. This false "unity in diversity" is precisely what Satan will use in order to hypnotize the mass mind in the last days. And if you have no particular religious belief and give yourself over to some kind of vague idea, then the demons come in and begin to act, as the many New-Age cult mass suicides attest."

5 May 2008 at 11:45  
Blogger Little Black Sambo said...

Your Grace,
I have read the whole article again & much admired the American's analysis. However, as to your last paragraph I am none the wiser. I fear I am not merely inattentive but dense.

5 May 2008 at 12:06  
Anonymous mickey said...

As I said earlier, this "New World Order" has just one minor obstacle to overcome, as reported in last week's Telegraph:

"China has secretly built a major underground nuclear submarine base that could threaten Asian countries and challenge American power in the region, it can be disclosed.

Satellite imagery, passed to The Daily Telegraph, shows that a substantial harbour has been built which could house a score of nuclear ballistic missile submarines and a host of aircraft carriers.

In what will be a significant challenge to US Navy dominance and to countries ringing the South China Sea, one photograph shows China’s latest 094 nuclear submarine at the base just a few hundred miles from its neighbours.

Other images show numerous warships moored to long jettys and a network of underground tunnels at the Sanya base on the southern tip of Hainan island.

Of even greater concern to the Pentagon are massive tunnel entrances, estimated to be 60ft high, built into hillsides around the base. Sources fear they could lead to caverns capable of hiding up to 20 nuclear submarines from spy satellites.

The US Department of Defence has estimated that China will have five 094 nuclear submarines operational by 2010 with each capable of carrying 12 JL-2 nuclear missiles."

Gordon et al had better start telling the Chinese about his plans pronto, as they seem to be reading from another script (whilst we fight pointless and economically destructive wars - I think we, the British, been here before; cue 1913 as Voyager suggested, albeit making a different point).

5 May 2008 at 12:12  
Anonymous Sir Henry Morgan said...

So if we have one-world governance, and I dissent, where will I go to seek asylum from its suppression of dissent?

Oh - lbsambo - I think he means Jesus.

Your Grace: have I been paying attention?

5 May 2008 at 12:14  
Blogger Cranmer said...

Sir Henry,

No, you have not.

Tut.

Sometimes His Grace wonders why he bothers.

5 May 2008 at 12:22  
Anonymous Sir Henry Morgan said...

Your Grace:

We bother because, in our different ways, we care. We can do no other (Apologies to Martin Luther).

5 May 2008 at 13:36  
Blogger Snuffleupagus said...

Little Black Sambo
The clue is not in the post itself but in what you alreay know of His Grace.

Cameron is who it is.

5 May 2008 at 14:03  
Blogger Alfred of Wessex said...

Snuffleupagus 05 May 2008 14:03 said...

Little Black Sambo
The clue is not in the post itself but in what you alreay know of His Grace.

Cameron is who it is.


I think not. If you read his Grace's last paragraph again, and especially the last sentence again very carefully, the awful truth will dawn on you:

"Stature, charisma, compassion, credibility, experience, political skill, spirituality, a global profile – that man is not Gordon Brown, but Gordon Brown knows who it is."

Anthony Charles Lynton Blair.

As a nominal Anglican, he presided over a government whose immigration policies will result in Britain becoming an islamic country within 50-100 years, then "conversion" to Roman Catholicism as a prerequisite of acceptability as the first President of Europe. Ultimately, President of the World.

If anyone can fulfil the role of the antichrist, it is he.

5 May 2008 at 14:18  
Blogger Alfred of Wessex said...

PS. Do I get a prize?

5 May 2008 at 14:20  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

For Brown to describe Teddy Kennedy in such glowing terms must surely give heart to Jeffrey Archer.

Anyone of a similar age can debunk such nonsence with one word "Chappaquiddick".

If you are too young - google it - and see what kind of man attracts Brown's admiration

5 May 2008 at 14:50  
Blogger Homophobic Horse said...

"Anatoliy Golitsyn's first book, 'New Lies for Old', caused a long-running sensation when it was discovered that, unlike most Western analysts, the Author had accurately predicted, some years ahead of the events, the 'Break with the Past' which took place in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union in 1989-91. In his book 'Wedge: The Secret War between the FBI and CIA' [Alfred A Knopf, New York, 1994], Mark Riebling, who carried out a methodical analysis of Golitsyn's predictions in 'New Lies for Old', credited the Author with 'an accuracy record of nearly 94%'. This singular achievement puts all other analysts, including some official services, to shame; and it is precisely because of his record of pin-point accuracy that Western Governments, policy makers and even some intelligence services, whose record bears little comparison with Golitsyn's, have competed with one another over the years to find reasons why Golitsyn's perceptive explanations of Soviet strategy should be ignored. But events as they unfold are relentlessly proving this remarkable analyst of Soviet strategy to be right. 'The Perestroika Deception' explains the
devious secret intent behind the Leninist strategy which the 'former' Communists are pur-suing under cover of fake 'reform' and 'progress towards democracy'. The immediate strategic objective is 'convergence' with the West - on their terms, not ours. The ultimate objective is Lenin's: replacement of nation states with collective regional governments as building blocks of the 'New World Social Order' - World [Communist] Government."

Get the BitTorrent here.

5 May 2008 at 16:37  
Blogger Little Black Sambo said...

BLAIR? No wonder I didn't get it. What a relief! Perhaps I am not dense after all.

5 May 2008 at 16:44  
Anonymous Beachhutman blogs Beijing said...

Excellent posting M'Lord. It would be good if the paras on the wretched EU were to be writ large in the wider world, but alas, the msm are as craven and mendacious as Broon

5 May 2008 at 17:03  
OpenID curly15 said...

Never mind, we can all get ready for the next Brown relaunch, after a review, of course!

5 May 2008 at 17:34  
Anonymous Adrian P said...

Read the blog, now watch the movie

http://endgamethemovie.com

6 May 2008 at 00:04  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

From David Lonsdale, not anonymous.

Understanding the prophecies in the Bible can be like looking through a glass darkly. However, on one thing are most interpreters of biblical prophecy in agreement and that is that in the end times there will be a push for a global government and global religion.

The vicar of the church I attended in England 40 years ago used to warn of this development. Now we see Gordon Brown encouraging us in this direction. Clearly this son of the manse is a pawn in the hands of Satan.

6 May 2008 at 07:56  
Anonymous some bloke said...

Newly arrived Your Grace so please forgive any lapses.

I'd rather been thinking of Mr. Putin as the Anti-Christ but if the best that NWO Bilderbergers can come up with is Gordon Brown as Tony Blairs spokesman then perhaps we can all rest in peace.

6 May 2008 at 08:21  
Blogger John Trenchard said...

Your Grace,

On other forums I would use coarse language to describe what Gordon Brown has just done in that speech to alienate our American friends.

Instead I shall bescumber him from my orifices, whilst labelling him as a coccydynia and a ninnyhammer.

More useful non-coarse insults here

6 May 2008 at 13:49  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A splendid speech/article/blog post...

Or what is it?

Can we have a link please?

6 May 2008 at 17:41  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Blogger Alfred of Wessex said...
Anthony Charles Lynton Blair.
If anyone can fulfil the role of the antichrist, it is he."

I am in agreement. Back in 1997 my mother, who has never been particularly religious, voted LibDem despite being a long time labour supporter. When I asked her why she answered 'I think he is the Anti-Christ'.

Since then I have been following the unfolding of the New World Order and believe that has become so blatant that it simply can't be ignored.

6 May 2008 at 17:43  
Anonymous Aleksander Kerensky said...

Be careful what you wish for.

6 May 2008 at 19:59  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

gordon brown has been watching to much star trek

6 May 2008 at 20:49  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

They are creating a new race of People, they call them 'EUropeans.

Demographic decline of the British and Europeans
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=q71iddDm_U4#
We, the EUropean Elite are Creating a New Race of voters called 'Europeans'
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/865
we can count on the Immigrant vote
http://www.bobpiper.co.uk/2008/05/not_more_bloody_initiatives.php#comments

8 May 2008 at 17:44  
Anonymous USpace said...

Gordon Brown is a Leftist moon bat in a suit deluded by the evil siren song of utopia. He's not trying to destroy the world. He actually believes that crap he's peddling.
.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
expand the welfare state

favor the immigrants
till the natives vote you out


absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
give your country away

to those unelected
by your citizenry


absurd thought -
God of the Universe wants
ONE world government

on the way to Star Trek
LONG LIVE THE FEDERATION

.
Help Halt Terrorism Now!

FREE Absurd Thoughts eBook!

:)
.

9 May 2008 at 17:41  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

New World Order/Scottish Ritual Freemasonry.

Remember World War II and attempts at the 'Final Solution'?

So do others.

* Scottish Ritual Freemasonry's H.Q. is at 96 George Street, Edinburgh, Scotland - builders of the U.S. White House.
* The Knesset (Masonic Lodge) was specifically designed and built by Rothschild.
* Adolf Hitler was a Rothschild offshoot.
* Watch the globally and strategically placed 'black dots'/'traditional handshakes' as they tour the world, and the picture emerges e.g. Bush-Blair-Brown-Rothschild!

There is growing awareness of Mountbatten-Windsor (British royal family) attempts to hinder public awareness of these Days of Elijah details. The attempt also is to try to thwart understanding and accountability for their intended World War Three evils.

See e.g. elizaearsman.com

28 January 2009 at 21:02  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Newer›  ‹Older