Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Geert Wilders banned from UK

Cranmer is aghast with incredulity to hear that Dutch politician Geert Wilders has been barred from entering the UK, despite having committed no crime, and despite having been invited by members of the House of Lords.

He is a democratically-elected citizen of the European Union, and thereby entitled – as are all citizens of the EU – to free movement within and across member states. He has broken no law in the Netherlands, in the UK, or even in the EU. He simply made a film which was critical of aspects of Islam Jihadism, and for that, he is deprived of his rights as a citizen of the EU. The United Kingdom government has refused him entry to the UK because his views ‘threaten community harmony and therefore public security’. The Government invoked Article 19 of the 2006 Immigration Regulations, which permit the Home Office to ban a person from the United Kingdom ‘if his exclusion is justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health’.

Dutch Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen said the Dutch government would press Britain to reverse the ban, saying he ‘deeply regretted’ that a Dutch lawmaker had been barred access. He said: "It is disgraceful that a Dutch parliamentarian should be refused entrance to an EU country."

Indeed it is. It establishes that the Jihadis govern Britian more than either the governments of the UK or the EU. For fear of civil unrest, liberty is diminished; for fear of Lord Ahmed’s 10,000 descending upon Parliament, the truth may not be preached.

Mr Wilders called the Government's decision ‘cowardly’ and has vowed to defy it. It is not immediately clear how he intends to do this. He has said: "Let them try to detain me," indicating that he intends to attempt entry, and expects to be arrested. According to The Daily Telegraph, Mr Wilders said: "I shall probably go to Britain anyway on Thursday. Let us see if they put me in handcuffs on arrival. It is an unbelievable decision made by a group of cowards."

By way of explanation for the ban, the Home Office said it ‘opposes extremism in all its forms’ and would work to ‘stop those who want to spread extremism, hatred and violent messages in our communities from coming to our country’.

Is it extremist to oppose extremism? Is it extremist to expose Islamism? Is it extremist to defend freedom, demand justice or uphold liberty?

And if they wish to stop those who spread extremism and hatred, why do they grant free access to the likes of radical Islamic cleric Sheikh Al Yusuf Qaradawi, who appears to advocate the murder of homosexuals and Israeli civilians and the beating-up of women? Is this not a ‘violent message’ which the Home Office ought to stop? And why do they permit anti-Semites in the House of Lords? They let in Egyptian Abu Hamza – a brutal apologist for extremism and violence, yet bar Geert Wilders for daring to criticise the hatred and bile Hamza spouts. The Home Office is concerned to limit ‘racism’, but manifests a de facto racism against Jews and white Christians.

Lord Pearson of Rannoch, one of the Peers who invited Mr Wilders to the House of Lords, called the Government’s decision ‘weak and unacceptable in the extreme’.

In the extreme?

Should the Home office not be opposing itself?

As far as Cranmer is aware, Lord Pearson and Baroness Cox intend to proceed with their showing of Fitna on Thursday. Extra security has been ordered. Lord Pearson had issued a press release revealing that the postponed screening of the film was nothing to do with Lords Ahmed’s claims in the Pakistan press that the event had been cancelled in response to his and other Muslim leaders’ threats, which apparently represented a ‘victory for the Muslim community’. Lord Pearson states that the postponement was in order to ‘allow time for clarification on issues concerning freedom of speech’.

Baroness Cox has explained that ‘the original postponement occurred as a result of the organisers finding out that Mr Wilders had previously advocated banning the Qur’an, and that therefore “it seemed then a little inconsistent” to give him a platform’.

The disclosure of Lord Ahmed’s ‘threat’ apparently came after the decision to postpone.

But the reality is that Lord Ahmed has his victory. As the Dutch courts intend to prosecute a Dutch lawmaker for daring to criticise Islam (which is deemed to be racist and incitement to hatred), the British government limits freedom of expression and curtails participation in public debate.

All of which further establishes that the UK’s blasphemy laws have not been abolished; merely amended to suit the predominant religio-political force. You can criticise Christianity, denigrate the Bible or demean Jesus to your heart’s content, for Christians pose no threat to the Queen’s Peace. But Allah forbid that you criticise Islam, question the Qur’an or defame Mohammed, for to do so would certainly imperil the peace and security of the Realm.


Blogger John M Ward said...

I hate to have to put it this way, but it is looking as though the only decent countries now will be those with no Muslims at all. I wonder if there are any such in the world today?

11 February 2009 at 07:43  
Anonymous Shaven-headed tattooed knuckledragger said...

Why aren't the 'Opposition' opposing this. Come on Mr Cameron and your fellow Tories. Are you the party of Churchill or the party of Chamberlain?

11 February 2009 at 08:03  
Anonymous Courage in the Face of Adversity said...

Brown's runny Courage

11 February 2009 at 08:21  
Anonymous Alexandrian said...

Why are you surprised, Your Grace? In the past dozen years, Britain has become a nation where the rules have multiplied, and things previously considered normal in a free society have been proscribed.

Like Mr Ed Balls, I fear the rise of totalitarian and repressive government - though my reasons are slightly different from his.

One could start to paraphrase Niemoller . . .

11 February 2009 at 08:30  
Anonymous Gnostic said...

My father was a professional soldier. He served in WWII, Palestine, Korea and the Cyprus emergency. He fought for freedom and to protect this country from its enemies. He continued to fight for his beliefs through the ballot box until he died in the summer of 2007.

Today he is spinning in his grave.

Never have I witnessed such a shameful and cowardly act of capitulation performed in MY name, in this country's name. Smith doesn't speak for me, my friends or my family. None of us gave her a mandate to do that. In fact we didn't vote for the treacherous moron at all.

Geert Wilders has unwittingly forced our benighted government's hand. It's treachery is there for anyone with eyes to see.

Smith has succeeded where all others have failed. By this outrageous and cowardly ban on free speech and common sense she has made me ashamed to be British.

Thanks Jackie!

11 February 2009 at 08:31  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Spineless gutless cowards, not wonder people are going over to radical right wing parties, the three main ones have given our country away. Enoch was right, perhaps a few years late but right.

11 February 2009 at 08:37  
Anonymous DB said...

I agree with the shaven-headed one. The silence from the Tory front bench on this matter is unforgivable - literally so, as in "I won't forgive them".

11 February 2009 at 08:37  
Anonymous Gnostic said...

Yeah, Dave. Your spine and guts have been mouldering away in a cupboard for far too long. Take them out, dust them off and let's see some REAL opposition for a change.

11 February 2009 at 08:55  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have much respect for Baroness Cox (and note that she has now been 'outed' as the peer who issued the original invitation). I had never heard of Lord Pearson until this morning. A quick Google search reveals, however, that both may have an agenda in this matter which has little to do with our country's best interests.

My concern is that both appear to be prominent Christian Zionists with links to the Israeli right wing. The agenda of the latter is unambiguous. It is to turn the West against Muslim people and facilitate a conflagration in the Middle East which, ultimately, will lead to a Greater Israel.

We, in this country, should not be playing that game.

11 February 2009 at 09:04  
Anonymous Shaven-headed tattooed knuckledragger said...

Taking up Alexandrian's theme on government control-freakery, I could point out that Mr Ed Balls' fear of the rise of Fascism has come a little too late.

If Fascism is defined as an authoritarian system that puts the power of the State above the rights of the individual, then we already have a Fascist government.

If we look at the measures that NuLabour have brought in over the past decade then we observe:

(1) Politicisation of the police.

(2) Thought-crime legislation.

(3) Attempts to imprison political opponents for speaking their minds.

(4) Government control of broadcasting.

(5) Anti-terror legislation used to persecute peaceful protesters.

(6) Gestapo-style raids on political opponents.

(7) An immense burden of meddlesome legislation that turns ordinary people into criminals.

(8) Schools used for political brainwashing.

(9) Political opponents denied employment.

(10) Favoured ethnic groups given massive preference in resources, employment, housing and immunity from prosecution.

(11) Growth of a vast state bureaucracy of snoopers.

(12) A huge increase in computer and CCTV surveillance.

(13) Micromanagement of every aspect of peoples' lives.

(14) Attempts to destroy all non-state controlled institutions where proles can meet and exchange unauthorised opinions (eg use of taxation and licensing legislation to destroy community centres such as pubs and village halls)

(15) Abolition of habeas corpus.

(16) Attempts to abolish trial by jury.

(17) Deliberate destruction of the family in favour of state agencies.

If this isn't a Fascist agenda then I don't know what is! Your Grace's communicants can no doubt think of other items to add to it.

On the other hand, we 'far-right' knuckledraggers want the repeal of this repressive legislation and a return to our ancestral freedoms, a roll back of the power of the State, and an education system and society that re-establishes traditional freedoms, duties and responsibilities of its citizens.

11 February 2009 at 09:10  
Blogger someday said...

Does Your Grace have an opinion on the Synod's decision to ban BNP membership?

11 February 2009 at 09:50  
Blogger ENGLISHMAN said...

So will we all be going to westminster tomorrow?

11 February 2009 at 09:58  
Blogger Jules said...

Haven't politicians grasped that every time they do something like this parties like the BNP get just a little bit more legitimate in the eyes of the public?

In reality as other posters have pointed out the difference between New Labour and the BNP is not great. The BNP loathe non-white people but in most other respects the two parties are left-wing totalitarians.

I used to care deeply about the rule of law and I used to respect the police. No more. Since our democratic institutions have been subverted and perverted I will do what I regard to be morally correct. The legality or illegality of any action is now secondary for me.

Thank God for Christianity - the rock to which I cling in this storm.

11 February 2009 at 10:00  
OpenID jobtwenteewun1to3 said...

My bible teaches me that in the 8th century BC the Northern Kingdom of Israel came under the judgement of God for its wickedness and sin. The judgement in question was carried out through conquest by a cruel and vicious foreign people - The Assyrians.

My bible teaches me that in the 6th century BC the Southern Kingdom of Judah came under the judgement of God for its wickedness and sin. The judgement in question was carried out through conquest by a cruel and vicious foreign people - The Babylonians.

In both of the above cases a long period of prophetic warnings preceeded the final conquests. It was the hope of the prophets that the people would see the depths of depravity their nations had fallen into, repent and return to covenant relationship with their God. In both cases the warnings went unheeded.

It is my contention that in the 21st century AD the Western Church specifically and the Western World generally is under the judgement of God for its wickedness and sin. The judgement in question is being carried out by conquest by a cruel and vicious foreign people - Islamic Jihadists.

A long period of prophetic warnings have preceeded the current situation. It has been the hope of those who warned, that the people would see the depths of depravity their nations have fallen into. It seems that the warnings will likely go unheeded.

It seems that almost on a daily basis the Islamic stranglehold upon this nation is tightening.

If there is to be an ultimate avoidance of 'dhimmitude' in this and other Western countries, it will firstly require the Christian Churches to repent of its cowardice, compromise and betrayal of her Lord to be followed by a return to the uncompromising biblical standards it once held.

I am not confident....

11 February 2009 at 10:40  
Anonymous Shaven-headed tattooed knuckledragger said...

Jules, it isn't true that "the BNP loathe non-white people".

On our formerly Labour-voting post-industrial housing estate ('it's grim oop North') , the BNP supporters can be divided into four fairly distinct categories:

(1) Ethnic nationalists. Only this category is likely to contain racists and anti-Semites.

(2) Economic nationalists - people who have no objections to foreigners as individuals, but don't like them taking their jobs.

(3) Cultural nationalists. People who expect immigrants to integrate with British culture. This group are 'Islamophobic' but not necessarily racist. Formerly they would have been Powellite Tories.

(4) Anglospherists. This group aren't really nationalists at all. They are internationalists of a rather restricted range. They are anti-EU, anti-Islam, pro-American, usually pro-Israeli and often pro-Indian.

11 February 2009 at 10:44  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is going to be up to the people to get this country back on track. The politicians are in league with the invaders and oppressors, the CoE is in league with the politicians. If it cannot be done at the ballot box then there will have to be exploration of other avenues. Anyone who thinks the British will lie down for much longer is sadly mistaken. The Bulldog spirit will rise up again

11 February 2009 at 10:44  
Blogger ultramontane grumpy old catholic said...

Winston Churchill, in the 1945 election campaign was shouted down when he tried to equate the then Labour party with the Nazis.

It appears that he was just a little previous.

A slogan for our times -

"New Labour - putting the nationalism back into socialism!"

11 February 2009 at 10:45  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

John Ward said : is looking as though the only decent countries now will be those with no Muslims at all...
It isn't just the muslims that we need to get rid of. If we want a peaceful, democratic and prosperous country once again then we must also get rid of all socialists. No exceptions. There is no point in trying to reason with either of them because they are not capable of being persuaded that their beliefs are utterly wrong. They are probably genetically programmed to believe what they do. So, mass culling of the population will be necessary. Or maybe we will descend into a protracted guerrilla-type civil war between them (the muslims and the socialists) and the rest of us.

11 February 2009 at 11:08  
Anonymous not a machine said...

this all wrong mr wilders is saying somthing , whats islam got to be spooked for ??

he will be asked about his motives , lords can make their mind up .

they just dont get the difference betweeb free speech and insult.

11 February 2009 at 11:08  
Anonymous indigolaughingmyarseoff said...

I am enjoying your humiliation. I hope they arrest him at the airport and send him back to his vile country. I am enjoying your frustration seeing you getting humiliated by your own elected officials. It is hilarious to me, I could not make any of this up, and if I were to, it would cost me a fortune to try and re create such humiliation, but as it happens this is free.

Allah the Great One! Who is greater than the Christian God, who has more influence in the modern world than any other pathetic man made God has ever had...EVER.

11 February 2009 at 11:17  
Anonymous not a machine said...

still cant debate then indigolaughingmyarse off

just asking because i am sure your a nutter posing as intellect

laughing my arse off at poor post from indingo child

11 February 2009 at 11:26  
Blogger The Heresiarch said...

On a point of fact, Qaradawi is also now banned from Britain. As are a great number of Islamist types, such as Omar Bakri. What has happened, I think, owes less to indulgence of Islamists than an obsession with preserving "community cohesion" and social order. The British government simply isn't interested in matters of principle. If you could organise a large enough mob to shout obscenities at Angelina Jolie, I've no doubt she would be banned too.

They banned Martha Stewart!

11 February 2009 at 11:27  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Islam and Socialism arm in arm.
Strange bedfellows don`t you think!
Whatever do they have in common?

11 February 2009 at 11:27  
Anonymous Shaven-headed tattooed knuckledragger said...

Still not a word on this story from al-Beeb.

On the other hand, the totally inconsequential decision by the CofE synod to excommunicate the BNP is getting loads of coverage.

Fifty or a hundred years ago this decision would have affected the BNP membership drive by way of the BANNED IN BOSTON phenomenon, whereby denunciation by self-righteous, sanctimonious and out-of-touch clergy was guarranteed to increase the popularity of the object of their wrath.

But nowadays the CofE is of so little relevance to the average prole that it is unlikely to have any effect one way or the other.

11 February 2009 at 11:41  
Blogger Jules said...

Shaven-headed tattooed knuckledragger:

I wouldn't dispute your assertions regarding some BNP supporters not being racist. However, I'm sure that many people who voted Nazi in the elections in pre-war Germany were also not anti-semites. You need to look at the guiding philosophy of the leadership.

The BNP are very good at appearing to be reasonable democratic politicians. They are essentially gulling decent people into voting for them. Scrape away the facade and it's clear that the BNP are motivated by hatred.

11 February 2009 at 11:54  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

As your Grace has said,
The Jihadis are now leading parliament.
Not by democracy, not by election, but by,

11 February 2009 at 12:17  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What does it matter if a man gains the whole world but loses his soul?

The whole lot of us are going to hell except we place our trust in Jesus. There is no other way to salvation. It does not matter whether you are a Jew, a mullah, a Hindu, a Sikh, a Druid or a member of any cordially spiritual persuasion. It matters not if your nominally christian country is invaded from within by immigrants with a creed from Jurassic Park, nor if your craven officials haven't the stomach to fight what will eventually destroy them.

In the end it boils down to this: Did Christ die for our sin and rise again from the dead or did he not? Will he judge the living and the dead?

Its a binary choice. Read Kipling's 'Lest we forget' and be reminded that in the end there is no law that says that Whitehall can't look like the ruins of Babylon or any other scuppered civilisation who placed their trust in a false god [or none at all].

11 February 2009 at 12:31  
Blogger Rebel Saint said...

Combined with the ludicrous decision by the CofE synod yesterday, this news has assured the BNP of the money that used to go on the collection plate.

The lunatics have taken over the asylum. God help us, literally.

11 February 2009 at 12:55  
Blogger John said...

This is David Cameron's moment. I'm waiting . . .

But in the meantime, this news has also been blogged at PJC Journal with useful comments.

11 February 2009 at 13:23  
Anonymous Shaven-headed tattooed knuckledragger said...


"Labour peer Lord Ahmed, who expressed his concerns to the Parliamentary authorities about Mr Wilders' visit, said he welcomed the decision to ban the MP.

"It would be unwise to have him in the UK because this man's presence would cause hatred," he said.

"He has a case against him in the Amsterdam court for inciting hatred."

Lord Ahmed, who said other Muslim peers shared his concerns, stressed that Mr Wilders' views would certainly present a threat to public order.

"When Muslims are attacked obviously you will see people react to that."

11 February 2009 at 15:03  
Anonymous rebellious mouse said...

As Jules suggests - the rule of law has rather lost its strength.
It's a while since Dickens character said "The law is an ass" - but our parents taught us to respect it anyway. However, in those days Brits had legal ways of influencing the law. Now we don't.

Even the HoL can't influence the law? So why don't they lead the revolution? One start might be to bring in the Dutchman regardless and then present the islamists with their own kind of argument, a 'fait accompli.'

I wouldn't like to see anything so demeaning as smuggling him through a tunnel - I'm sure their lordships have more dignified means at their disposal than the creeping, slimy, islamic hordes who made nonsense of immigration law in the first place....

However, where there's a will. And Englishman - if I could go to Westminster tomorrow, I would. It is way past time for action to begin.

11 February 2009 at 15:16  
Anonymous indigochild said...

You poor things! God is not listening to your whinging and whining. You are all doomed!

Maybe some advice from the Satanists could help you, not that I subscribe to belief any pathetic deity, but this one amuses me greatly:

The 8th Satanic rule of Earth:

8. Do not complain about anything to which you need not subject yourself.
This is one of the greatest pieces of social advice ever. Satanists aim to be powerful people, taking their lives into their own hands because if you can't look after yourself, no-one else will. If something is wrong that you could easily change then change it. It's pro-active. Don't moan, complain or whinge, simply deal with it. Life is not fair and never will be, you need to not complain about that which is not fair and go about rectifying the problem.

Poor Christians! Stuck between a rock and a hard place.

11 February 2009 at 16:09  
Blogger Homophobic Horse said...

I am of the opinion that a significant BNP victory would be a disaster long in the making.

11 February 2009 at 16:25  
Blogger Bert Rustle said...

Wild and baseless speculation might lead one to the conclusion that the legal case against Wilders has been instigated to tarnish Wilders and give other states the excuse not to admit him. After all, Hate sticks.

11 February 2009 at 17:00  
Blogger Microcosm said...

Yet another sad day for freedom of speech, which is a requirement for serious debate. Only I must share anons concerns on this matter, there is evidence Deerty Geerty is a Zionist tool.

There is nothing Geerty could have said to the Lords that the Lords cannot say for themselves.

Lets here them do it in the name of freedom!

11 February 2009 at 17:23  
Anonymous white mouse said...

Well HH - lead on.... The field's wide open, and eternity's the limit!

I believe Anon at 12:31 is right.

11 February 2009 at 17:37  
Anonymous Kristian Maclauder said...

My feeling is total disbelief. UK ones a beckon of light, home of the Magna Carta and a country to admire has now completely lost it marbles and are rapidly descending into a dark abyss. Word can not describe the anger, contempt and disappointment I feel against the UK (government) at this moment.
Banning a Dutch parliamentarian entry to UK, who was invited to UK by a member of the House of Lords for nothing more the expressing an opinion, and at the same time harboring people who wants to wage war on the west and its liberties. My God you can’t make this stuff up.
68 years after Churchill’s “We Shall Fight on the Beaches” speech with the famous line “…..we shall never surrender” its saddens me to say “UK now you have!”

Good luck to you all, you're going to need it.

Terribly sorry for the lack of English skills, but the Danish education system isn’t what it used to be.

11 February 2009 at 17:38  
Anonymous peoplehater said...

Keep your peckers up. Resistance is futile. You have all been very very silly, naughty people. Your one-eyed Scottish idiot knows what's best for you, its the right thing to do, och eye the noo!

11 February 2009 at 18:11  
Blogger ZZMike said...

"But Allah forbid that you criticise Islam, question the Qur’an or defame Mohammed, for to do so would certainly imperil the peace and security of the Realm."

The writing is on the wall (if it's still acceptable to refer to a Christian proverb).

Formerly Great Britain has now joined Dhar al-Islam.

Mr Knuckledragger asks, "Are you the party of Churchill or the party of Chamberlain?"

Is there any doubt?

He's also absolutely on point with his 17-point list.

We'd be well advised, on this side of the pond, to keep a careful watch for those things.

Anonymous: "Islam and Socialism arm in arm. Strange bedfellows don`t you think! Whatever do they have in common?"

The destruction of the West.

Kristian Maclauder: "Good luck to you all, you're going to need it."

That, and the usual last words of a Judge, while pronouncing sentence:

"And may God have mercy on your soul."

That is, if Fromerly Great Britain has a soul left.

11 February 2009 at 19:51  
Blogger Head of Legal said...

I'm glad you've been writing about all this, your Grace - it's a scandal, isn't it?

But I reckon the decision to exclude him is unlawful.

11 February 2009 at 20:33  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I see some posters slate the BNP party of hate anti muslim etc? something I dont agree that they are but pray tell me good people where am i to turn? do I vote labour to help me out against the muslim onslaught? libdems spinelss party they are, or the dear old tories with soft dave who attacks like a toothless kitten, or do I turn to a party that at least might hold out hope of standing up for my views, its funny how the 3 main parties spend more time discrediting the BNP that actual putting across their policies am I racist? I distrust islam for all the reasons stated on these blogs, but I have many friends and relatives from different countries? Come on all you political giants tell me who to vote for.
P.S I have never voted for the BNP.

11 February 2009 at 22:38  
Blogger John said...

"but pray tell me good people where am i to turn?"

Anonymous, please refer to my post above.

11 February 2009 at 23:09  
Blogger Spartan said...

As usual our MP's are bloody silent. Gutless wonders!

11 February 2009 at 23:24  
Blogger John Trenchard said...

too all the commenters above who are sick of the Tories , and are looking for somewhere to go...

there is hope folks. and its not the BNP.

its the Libertarian Party


if you want real RADICAL change in this country, the LP is the only game in town.

12 February 2009 at 00:36  
Blogger John Trenchard said...

(4) Anglospherists. This group aren't really nationalists at all. They are internationalists of a rather restricted range. They are anti-EU, anti-Islam, pro-American, usually pro-Israeli and often pro-Indian.

11 February 2009 10:44

very interesting post. i would class myself as an anglospherist. i know others who would fit exactly into each of the other categories. my wife, for example, is a "cultural nationalist", and definitely not anglospherist like me. i know of others (work, friends, relatives) who fit into one of the 4 categories...

your analysis is spot on. somebody should hire you.

12 February 2009 at 00:43  
Blogger John Trenchard said...

Allah the Great One! Who is greater than the Christian God, who has more influence in the modern world than any other pathetic man made God has ever had...EVER.

11 February 2009 11:17

fake troll. definitely not muslim.

Muslims never think that Jews and Christians worship the "wrong" God... the bone of contention is that Mohammed was the messiah returned and that the SAME GOD had a new message, contained in the Koran.

try trolling a bit harder next time.

12 February 2009 at 00:47  
Anonymous You MUST start to fight back said...

Forget the Immigrants, the enemy of our Society is in Westminster and Whitehall.

Sooner or later you have to make a stand against this tyrannical Government

12 February 2009 at 03:48  
Anonymous They demonise the BNP Because said...

The BNP is a Nationalist Party, they have always opposed the EU.
The EU is creating a new race of People.
They know we would never surrender sovereignty so we are being exterminated.

Vladimir Bukovsky warns of EU Totalitarianism

Anti British Psyops

Come With Me if you want to Live

Unnoficial Party Political Broadcast

Come With Me if you want to Live

12 February 2009 at 04:06  
Anonymous Rest in Peace Benazir Bhutto said...

Muslims are Patsies and a weapon of divide and ConqEUr.
7-7 was to Introduce the Police state

12 February 2009 at 04:13  
Anonymous DaveC said...

Head over here to the BBC page where you can hear Liberal Democrat (oh the irony of that name) Chris Huhne's ridiculous comments on the Radio 4's Today Programme advocating the ban on Geert Wilders. Huhne argues that Wilders' video will incite hatred in the UK. Well, Chris, surely this rather proves Geert's point, then? Who's hatred will he be inciting do you think? No prizes for guessing, incidentally. I'm thorougly ashamed of the Home Office.

12 February 2009 at 09:54  
Anonymous rebellious mouse said...

Dave C:

Let me get that straight... He was talking about inciting hatred of the haters, right?

Everthing's OK so long as the indigenes agree that the invaders have a right to highjack the English word 'hate' (which means strong dislike) - and turn it into a synonym for 'civil unrest' (=rebellion against invaders and opressors)?

As for the Home Office - they don't even know the meaning of Home.

12 February 2009 at 12:11  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wilders is at Heathrow now:

12 February 2009 at 14:53  
OpenID BL@KBIRD said...

Tocsin Bells your Grace?

12 February 2009 at 16:43  
Anonymous DaveC said...

rebellious mouse:

Yes, the hatred of the haters. I wonder if any one person can cope with all that haterd. They might just blow!

I agree with your point about semantics regarding 'hate'. 'Fundamentalist' and 'extremist' are rather inadequate words when it comes to describing people capable of decapitations and suicide bomings.

12 February 2009 at 18:20  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Q,Is it politically correct to behead someone?
A,Not yet possibly?

12 February 2009 at 19:25  
Blogger Atlas Shrugged said...

Islam and Socialism arm in arm.
Strange bedfellows don`t you think!
Whatever do they have in common?

Now that is an very interesting question.

I will do my best to answer this very complicated question. It is not easy, so please try your best to bare with me on this one.

Although at first site it seems obvious that they have nothing whatsoever in common.

IMO However socialism needs Islam infinitely more then Islam needs socialism.

Most people that describe themselves as socialist, have little or no real understanding of what socialism is really all about. Neither do they have the slightest idea, who invented it, finances it, and constantly changes and adapts is ideology to suit its rotten FASCIST style internationalist highly authoritarian aims.

Socialism is a Zionist invention, financed by Zionists, and run by Zionists from the top, to help create a FASCIST New World Order. That may shock people, but then many people who use the world Zionism have absolutely no idea what Zionism actually is.

To create a New World Order, the old one must first be destroyed. While of course preserving the real power that actually controls the world. Which is world finance and multi-national corporations, and the very small group of people that ultimately control that.

Which by definition is a RADICAL "BIG IDEA." but is certainly not a new one.

A big idea, as big as any idea can possibly get, while still being contained on this medium sized planet.

Internationalist socialism needs its foot soldiers, and the tools of its trade, to effect its desired end. Islam is therefore used as a convenient TOOL for socialist radical change. Later of course to be discarded and more later effectively destroyed, when its usefulness to the system eventually expires.

The Establishments BBC in the past called everything that happened in the old soviet union LEFT WING. Since circa 1990, The Establishments BBC has called exactly the same thinking within Modern Russia, RIGHT WING.

Thus Islam in an Islamic country is Right Wing. But in this country everything Islamic is called by the establishments BBC, LEFT WING.

The vast majority of people that vote for a socialist party do not know what socialism actually is, or what the real point of it has always been. But the many Fabian and other highly dishonest intellectuals at the BBC and within parliament, certainly do. Socialism is often accused of being based on a lie. This is because it IS based on a simply enormous great BIG lie. The biggest lie of all in fact. Or should I say The GREAT CONSPIRACY?

National socialism was a lie. There never has been any such thing in the medium and long term. If NS was simply national. WHY does it swiftly start invading other countries, when ever it gains a foothold?

It may have escaped many peoples notice that we now live in a very soon to be completely international socialist country, continent and world.

The forces of Islam have been used and still are being used by our Ruling elites to further enable the end of liberty, human individuality, property rights, and our hard died for FREEDOMS.

If the above does not make perfect sense, I am sorry. I did the best I could.

13 February 2009 at 19:36  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think what Islam and communism have in common is that the are ideologies that rule through control, suppression, and fear!
And they rely on the ignorance and the apathy of the individual to change their circumstances!

15 February 2009 at 14:09  
Blogger zebulon9 said...

Don't forGeert Wilders!
Stop talking, start acting.
Isn't Geert's freedom worth a stamp?

If Geert Wilders falls, then Freedom of speech is dead in Europe. We are launching an extensive International Action SITA including two possible texts ; one comparing Wilders and Winston Churchill and another Wilders and Charlie Chaplin:

To support Geert Wilders and our dearly acquired freedoms please participate to the 2 suggested actions and transmit this message to your friends owners of a website in order they publish it.

An other way to support Geert Wilders is to give some money. To donate:

22 February 2009 at 15:24  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Newer›  ‹Older