What is truth? Blair will be proved right about the crucial necessity of opposing islamo-facism in Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran. I think he'll probably be proved to be right about the Euro too - in 15 years time!
I can tell you what truth is not, truth is not when Obama dictates what the facts are about 9/11 truth does not ignore or steer around uncomfortable questions, Blairite-fascism is not truth.
Has his birth certificate been as thoroughly checked as Mr Obama's ought to have been? The separate states of the Union are entitled to legislate their own particular requirements for POTUS candidates to produce evidence of "natural born" status. But, of course, under Heath's Great Betrayal [European Communities] Act 1972 even that degree of sovereignty has been abrogated.
Tony Blair talks of a revolutionary change, yet the more the world changes the more it seems to remain the same. The same old corruption, lies, and class structures.
Which is not what most people would understand a revolution to be.
A political revolution is where power from the top is destroyed and replaced by power from the bottom. Such a revolution has never actually taken place anywhere on the globe since time began, but the accepted definition of a political revolution stays the same.
As there is no real revolution, simply the worlds power brokers making yet another periodic power grab, why does Tony Blair claim a need to change with it?
Surely in a democracy beneficial political stability is maintained by the forces of change and reaction working well at the same time.
In other words.
Change is regulated by a reaction against the changes that have shown themselves not to be generally beneficial to the public as a whole.
As a general rule it is unwise to try to put out a fire by adding more fuel or fanning the flames.
It is generally seen to be wise to change direction, when it has been shown that you are currently marching blindly in entirely the wrong one.
Change is NOT inevitable. Change happens either by an act of GOD, or because either a human being or a group of human beings have CONSPIRED to make the aforementioned change happen.
Very little, indeed virtually nothing at all as far as politics is concerned changes using any form of natural process; neither is change inherently a good, positive, or desirable thing.
Conservatism in its purest form is the common sense tendency to wish to conserve that which is evidently good, while changing that which is not.
Socialism, on the other hand, in its purest form is an establishment controlled collectivist death cult.
Tony Blair has thus shown us that he indeed a true socialist in the purest sense, a FABIAN socialist.
Well, at least he's consistent in thought. He did say (about 10? years ago) that it was his "destiny" to take the UK into the euro. What a complete numbskull that man is - except when it comes to his personal arrogance and greed.
"The Horror! The Horror!" It's even more nauseating than looking at cammers. I forced myself to watch this a couple of times: partly because he seems physically uncomfortable (I hope), but also to verify which other evil b** he now reminds me of.
On the words: He continues to assert the euSSR as the only conceivable political reality --- without acknowledging the absurdity of talking about a referendum on our resistance to its currency.
On the background: as revolting as the fiend in front of it; though it might drive me to read "Roman de la Rose" again.
I despise this man. IMHO he is the most practised liar of a politician that I have heard of in the English speaking world for the last 40 years, and I am including the otherwise great RM Nixon. Perhaps this because I was taken in by his smooth delivery in earlier days. Whatever be the matter, the EU, employment, abortion, mass immigration, finance, underaged drinking or sex, the Iraq war, he has consistently used his debating skills to fudge matters and and make things worse.
I find it impossible to find extreme enough language suitable for this august blog to express my utter and abiding disgust for this charlatan. The "having a larf" in donating the CofE a leadership lacking socialist for its head and the tragedy of decommissioning HMY Britannia speak for his petty spitefulness. I was most happy that he did not get invited to the Royal Wedding.I would have preferred it if he and his dreadful wife could be exiled preferably to the Middle East to which he donates so much time.
At 20:44 yesterday, I unwittingly spoke ill of the dead. I later learned that the person Blair called to mind died - earlier this year. They say he'd spent much of his end-time in and around The Congo; he suffered the NHS death also discussed on here.
Steve @ 21:07 : I do hope that you don't mean me? That would be a tad offensive, and not a little innacurate.
I use the term 'British' to define far more than political union. Genetically, being 'English' encapsulates several thousand years prior to old Hengist and Horsa, as the main-stay Northern European blood-line preceded their minimal genetic influence.
The Celt and the Angle-type, were both 'Britons' before ANY other form of political/civic identity.
As descriptions go 'Briton' is better than 'Celt' - one of which is extinct: as in Ancient Briton.
You know as well I do there are four distinct Nations in these islands. It was the work of all of our ancestors, remember?
As for 'minimal genetic influence' you haven't read the latest research between two universities.
We will survive as a Family of Nations if we keep our ethnicities intact. And yes, we are all Northern Europeans and at <0.6 per cent of the world's population we need to get a grip, or we're gone.
Anonymous above: I wholly agree with your last paragraph.
Further, I stand chastised for my use of the word 'Celt' an 18th, Century construct, but it is a convenient 'short-hand' understood by all etc.
I would like to know to what you refer as the ''latest research between two universities''? Similarly, You do not state the conclusion of that research; both would be useful, thank you.
I see that a German, who's attached to both Reading and UCLondon, is this month claiming that half of us are German. How convenient for the euSSR -
Perhaps Anon is talking about this work though, which clearly contradicts Professor Sykes at Oxford, and others who believe the numbers of A/S invaders may have been lower. So perhaps we should know what Sykes has to say in response...
[Not to forget about the massacres of Anglo-Saxons, as perpetrated at Hastings and the Harrowing of the North. And that the Normans, also, made a political hay out Anglo-Saxon identity; it's an old game].
Archbishop Cranmer takes as his inspiration the words of Sir Humphrey Appleby: ‘It’s interesting,’ he observes, ‘that nowadays politicians want to talk about moral issues, and bishops want to talk politics.’ It is the fusion of the two in public life, and the necessity for a wider understanding of their complex symbiosis, which leads His Grace to write on these very sensitive issues.
49 Comments:
Aren't we in enough trouble.
Nice furniture, pity about the bloke sitting in front of it.
Having wrecked the UK it would be a good idea if he could be given the chance to do the same thing for the EU
I agree anon, with Bush gone, Bin gone, letting Blair preside over the total collapse of the Demonic Empire would be fitting.
Thats the three bs out of the way, then maybe we can all start over in the light of truth.
What is truth? Blair will be proved right about the crucial necessity of opposing islamo-facism in Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran. I think he'll probably be proved to be right about the Euro too - in 15 years time!
But he deposed the man who had???? WMD and who opposed islamofascism in Iraq. The Euro will be gone in 15 months time.
I can tell you what truth is not, truth is not when Obama dictates what the facts are about 9/11 truth does not ignore or steer around uncomfortable questions, Blairite-fascism is not truth.
The only thing left with these clowns is the will to power.
Has his birth certificate been as thoroughly checked as Mr Obama's ought to have been? The separate states of the Union are entitled to legislate their own particular requirements for POTUS candidates to produce evidence of "natural born" status. But, of course, under Heath's Great Betrayal [European Communities] Act 1972 even that degree of sovereignty has been abrogated.
Tony Blair talks of a revolutionary change, yet the more the world changes the more it seems to remain the same. The same old corruption, lies, and class structures.
Which is not what most people would understand a revolution to be.
A political revolution is where power from the top is destroyed and replaced by power from the bottom. Such a revolution has never actually taken place anywhere on the globe since time began, but the accepted definition of a political revolution stays the same.
As there is no real revolution, simply the worlds power brokers making yet another periodic power grab, why does Tony Blair claim a need to change with it?
Surely in a democracy beneficial political stability is maintained by the forces of change and reaction working well at the same time.
In other words.
Change is regulated by a reaction against the changes that have shown themselves not to be generally beneficial to the public as a whole.
As a general rule it is unwise to try to put out a fire by adding more fuel or fanning the flames.
It is generally seen to be wise to change direction, when it has been shown that you are currently marching blindly in entirely the wrong one.
Change is NOT inevitable. Change happens either by an act of GOD, or because either a human being or a group of human beings have CONSPIRED to make the aforementioned change happen.
Very little, indeed virtually nothing at all as far as politics is concerned changes using any form of natural process; neither is change inherently a good, positive, or desirable thing.
Conservatism in its purest form is the common sense tendency to wish to conserve that which is evidently good, while changing that which is not.
Socialism, on the other hand, in its purest form is an establishment controlled collectivist death cult.
Tony Blair has thus shown us that he indeed a true socialist in the purest sense, a FABIAN socialist.
Better known as, death by a thousand cuts.
I managed 1 min 30 secs before the sound of that dreadful little man's voice made me want to smash stuff up.
One would be able to live quite a successful life by finding out what Blair thought on a matter, and then doing the complete opposite.
Is it wrong to hope that he dies?
English Viking
Of course it's wrong to hope he dies - read your Scripture!
Have you ever considered an anger management course?
Mr blair is the malignancy that just keeps on giving.
"And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these [is] charity."
How say you Your Grace?
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dodo,
I can manage my anger just fine, thank you very much.
*grits teeth and head-butts keyboard*
PS Why should I not hope that this satanically inspired man shuffles off this mortal coil, before he kills anybody else?
17:04 was me.
Comments have gone a bit dicky. Again.
Well, at least he's consistent in thought. He did say (about 10? years ago) that it was his "destiny" to take the UK into the euro.
What a complete numbskull that man is - except when it comes to his personal arrogance and greed.
Tony Blair (et al) has been sighted for charges of Ethnocide against the English Nation.
Political policies to 'change Britain forever' were Blair's - his guilt therefore is beyond question.
An organisation called English Witness has promised to pursue Blair to the grave.
Steve
Steve,
Let's hope it's a short chase.
A bit like having an English Pope...
Does TB not look more and more like that grand old farceur Brian Rix of Whitehall fame the theatre which was just down the road from...
At least there would be bugger all chance of Brown having a career in Europe...Tone would see to that.
This piece of filth has more blood on his hands than Cromwell, and has inflicted more damage on a once great nation.
It's all I can do not to try and strangle the traitorous bastard.
NB: The word 'bastard' is used in the true meaning
PS The sooner his slot-gob wife gets what's coming, the better, too.
Imagine the revenues from a pay-per-view programme of his execution?
I'd remortgage my house to see it.
British vitriol - it can't be beaten! ''slot-gob wife'' priceless!
Some of these comments make one ashamed to be British. What has happened to this country?
"The Horror! The Horror!"
It's even more nauseating than looking at cammers. I forced myself to watch this a couple of times: partly because he seems physically uncomfortable (I hope), but also to verify which other evil b** he now reminds me of.
On the words: He continues to assert the euSSR as the only conceivable political reality --- without acknowledging the absurdity of talking about a referendum on our resistance to its currency.
On the background: as revolting as the fiend in front of it; though it might drive me to read "Roman de la Rose" again.
Oh Lord, please not the Euro.
http://deanroberts.net
I despise this man. IMHO he is the most practised liar of a politician that I have heard of in the English speaking world for the last 40 years, and I am including the otherwise great RM Nixon. Perhaps this because I was taken in by his smooth delivery in earlier days. Whatever be the matter, the EU, employment, abortion, mass immigration, finance, underaged drinking or sex, the Iraq war, he has consistently used his debating skills to fudge matters and and make things worse.
Ivan
Bleugh is so enamoured of, and corrupted by, wielding power he is unfit to be put in charge of a light switch let alone the EUSSR.
And while we are talking about the creep how come he isn't on trial for war crimes yet?
I find it impossible to find extreme enough language suitable for this august blog to express my utter and abiding disgust for this charlatan.
The "having a larf" in donating the CofE a leadership lacking socialist for its head and the tragedy of decommissioning HMY Britannia speak for his petty spitefulness.
I was most happy that he did not get invited to the Royal Wedding.I would have preferred it if he and his dreadful wife could be exiled preferably to the Middle East to which he donates so much time.
Such ungracious comments. Give the guy a break - history will be much kinder.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13919120
Oswin,
I'm English, not British.
Hah! The wv is cowdig.
Says it all really...
Actually, that's an insult to all cows.
English Viking: then as an Englishman you ought to take a compliment more graciously.
PS. Your cat has fleas.
Oswin,
He's got clap as well. I've tried to tell him, but he just won't listen.
English Viking@17:17
'Oswin,
I'm English, not British.'
Some people still don't understand the difference EV. English identity is over a thousand years deep.
British is a civic identity: property of the Crown. They mold it, make it mean anything. Say you're British and they own you.
Steve
Steve,
You are preaching to the converted.
Apologies EV but I'm also preaching to the can't-think-for-myself.
Steve
"Wyrd" is a good English word...
At 20:44 yesterday, I unwittingly spoke ill of the dead. I later learned that the person Blair called to mind died - earlier this year. They say he'd spent much of his end-time in and around The Congo; he suffered the NHS death also discussed on here.
And so to prayer.
Steve @ 21:07 : I do hope that you don't mean me? That would be a tad offensive, and not a little innacurate.
I use the term 'British' to define far more than political union. Genetically, being 'English' encapsulates several thousand years prior to old Hengist and Horsa, as the main-stay Northern European blood-line preceded their minimal genetic influence.
The Celt and the Angle-type, were both 'Britons' before ANY other form of political/civic identity.
English Viking @ 19:37
I really MUST resist the temptation to further the 'pussy' idiom!
Oswin@16:39 27 June 2011
As descriptions go 'Briton' is better than 'Celt' - one of which is extinct: as in Ancient Briton.
You know as well I do there are four distinct Nations in these islands. It was the work of all of our ancestors, remember?
As for 'minimal genetic influence' you haven't read the latest research between two universities.
We will survive as a Family of Nations if we keep our ethnicities intact. And yes, we are all Northern Europeans and at <0.6 per cent of the world's population we need to get a grip, or we're gone.
Steve
Anonymous above: I wholly agree with your last paragraph.
Further, I stand chastised for my use of the word 'Celt' an 18th, Century construct, but it is a convenient 'short-hand' understood by all etc.
I would like to know to what you refer as the ''latest research between two universities''? Similarly, You do not state the conclusion of that research; both would be useful, thank you.
I agree with Oswin - what is the research?
I see that a German, who's attached to both Reading and UCLondon, is this month claiming that half of us are German. How convenient for the euSSR -
Perhaps Anon is talking about this work though, which clearly contradicts Professor Sykes at Oxford, and others who believe the numbers of A/S invaders may have been lower. So perhaps we should know what Sykes has to say in response...
[Not to forget about the massacres of Anglo-Saxons, as perpetrated at Hastings and the Harrowing of the North. And that the Normans, also, made a political hay out Anglo-Saxon identity; it's an old game].
typos again :(. 'made political hay out of.' Sorry.
Perhaps we should listen to Tony ,he knows about money , made bundles of it apparently.
Post a Comment
<< Home