Tuesday, June 05, 2012

President Obama's Diamond Jubilee message to Her Majesty the Queen


Blogger Mr Integrity said...

Your Grace,
An extreemly sensitive and heart warming message for Her Majesty.

Sad that it came from a supporter of queens over there to our Queen over here.

5 June 2012 at 20:01  
Blogger Roy said...

President Obama seems to be a lot more friendly to Britain now than when he first became president. It was a very gracious message for the Queen.

5 June 2012 at 21:41  
Blogger bluedog said...

Your communicant thinks he means it, Your Grace.

As Obama fights his way through a Presidential election in competition with the man he calls 'George', is there a hint of wistfulness for the British system?

5 June 2012 at 22:14  
Blogger Atlas Shrugged said...

Those of us still capable of critical thinking this message will appear to be rather more then little confusing.

Most British people still think our most Gracious Majesty is little more then a Corgi obsessed little of lady whose only useful purpose is as a much needed boost to the British tourist industry.

American presidents of either The Republican or Democrat Party should represent the very antithesis of all that is represented by monarchy.

So why don't they?

To properly answer the question would take one many volumes of script. Suffice to say that a proper understanding of this very special relationship indeed is core to an understanding of how this world of our masters has long since been run from the very top.

Which is a level the likes of Obama, Bush, or Cameron can only dream of obtaining, and they know it.

What never fails to amaze me is that for some strange reason we are persisted in the belief that American presidents or British PM's have any real power at all worth note.

The special relationship of which Obama alludes to, has very little or nothing at all to do with the undeniable bond between the ordinary people of the English speaking world.

He is referring to the long standing and highly incestuous relationship between The Royal Institute for International Affairs in London, and The Council on Foreign Relations in Washington DC, of which Obama is a member.

Which are both bodies owned, controlled, sponsored, and brought into being by the exact same group of International Banksters.

Who do not just own our entire planets Central Banking System, oil, arms, mining, and pharmaceutical industries, among many other things, but most of which persists in being passed off as our own individual MINDS.

5 June 2012 at 22:36  
Blogger Dodo the Dude said...

Atlas threatened ...
"To properly answer the question would take one many volumes of script."

Just one word, surely: Jesuits!

He's a world leader, why wouldn't he appear genuine?

5 June 2012 at 22:41  
Blogger Atlas Shrugged said...

Just one word, surely: Jesuits!

He's a world leader, why wouldn't he appear genuine?

5 June 2012 22:41

Why not? Appearing to be genuine is his alloted task, his reason for being, indeed the only real reason we were ever given a chance to vote on anything at all in the first place.

As for the Jesuit influence. Our leaders are undoubtedly powerless puppets, but they are all either members of Jesuit orders, or are shortly to become one.

The Roman System, as continued and preserved by The RCC and its military wing The Society of Jesus, is the rock upon which all that mystically, traditionally, subversively, spiritually, covertly and overtly controls us is founded.

The above is not a matter of idle conjecture, pointless speculation, or fanciful conspiracy theory, it is one of very well documented, incontrovertible, free at the point of delivery, historical FACT.

One does not need to be David Icke or his like, to know what is clearly stated within ones own main stream history books, albeit deliberately disjointed, and so hidden in plain sight from the mindlessly profane, such as yourself.

If you cannot be bothered to read a history book, you could always try reading a copy of The Holy Bible, you never know you may actually educate yourself somewhat, although I doubt it.

5 June 2012 at 23:34  
Blogger Dodo the Dude said...


I see.

Now, was this 'Roman System' established in circa 100,000BC or was it in circa 4,000BC? (Nimrod and all that). You've suggested both in previous posts.

And before the founding of the RCC as cover for 'their' covert activities, what organisations and instruments did they use to coordinate world events.

I can find no answers to these questions in history books or in the Bible.

5 June 2012 at 23:44  
Blogger Dodo the Dude said...

little pope len

I've mentioned Nimrod in the same sentence as RCC.

What's taking you so long?

5 June 2012 at 23:46  
Blogger Atlas Shrugged said...

Of course one cannot be absolutely certain about everything, as I was not to my knowledge around at the time.

The Roman System as it has been named was not always called such for fairly obvious reasons, suffice to say that it is often referred as The Dawn of Civilization itself.

Civilization is usually dishonestly said to have begun in the middle eastern region within an area now known as Iraq. Which shortly afterwards became known as The Babylonian Empire. This was traditionally founded upon a religion which became known as Mystery Babylon. Biblical reference Book of Revelation chapter 17 verses 5-18.

Now to cut a very long story short.

This eventually moved on to places like Egypt, and then to Greece and then to Rome. Finally ending up in predominately 3 places Vatican City, The City of London and Washington DC. The Biblical references for this are so many and varied that it would be pointless mentioning any in particular, however the life and times of Moses, and The Children of Israel is a useful place to start.

However I would suggest you actually begin at Book of Genesis chapter 1 verse 1 and read on, for you would not wish to miss anything of importance.

You ask

And before the founding of the RCC as cover for 'their' covert activities, what organizations and instruments did they use to coordinate world events.

Obviously highly limited as compared to today, however the basic MO has not changed in the slightest. Also please be reminded that those parts of the world as was denominated within holy scripture for example composed wholly of that which was properly known by scholars at the time, not that which was not. That which was not was wrongly considered to be irrelevant.

Having said that, the basic answer to your question would seem to be more then a little obvious even to yourself, the list is thus.

Wars, fear, intimidation, lies, propaganda, empire, torture, division, established religion, despotism, occultism, famine, monarchy, government, pestilence, death, money changing, usury, indeed any nasty or not so nasty method which came to hand at the time.

The THEY, have to the most part operated secretly under many names over countless years, however the collective phase I prefer to use, is the priest-hoods.

Many members of this priest-hood, such as Sir Francis Bacon evidentially considered that civilization on earth actually began and all but completely vanished, many years before the rise and apparent fall of The Babylonian Empire.

As we now believe we know this planet to be at least 4.5 billion years old, it is perfectly possible that civilization could have come and gone hundreds or more times by now, and done so with not so much as the slightest trace of their existence left behind.

That is if you discount nonsense such as Darwinian Evolution, which I hope all properly thinking grown-ups have done so by now. After all no one ( not even Richard Dawkins ) seriously believes that we are terrestrially descended from a bunch infinitely lucky rock particles, or do they?

6 June 2012 at 01:07  
Blogger Dodo the Dude said...

Yes but if Babylonian Mysticism predated the RCC, what predated the Babylonian system?

And are you suggesting this 'body' has been around for 4.5 billion years? And how did 'they' and 'we' get here?

6 June 2012 at 01:15  
Blogger non mouse said...

Thank you, Your Grace.

Yes. As others observe, for once Obama seems to mean what he's saying, and he says it well. That's very pleasant.

Especially since I heard today that Japan has a larger navy than ours... even as the rest of the (mostly communist) "Orient" is jostling for control of the South China Sea and its oil and gas reserves.

Hmmm. There's more out there than just the silly little euSSR, then. And what was that I heard about Russia being prepared to help over that problem?

6 June 2012 at 04:24  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

He reads a teleprompter well. That's all. You are easily impressed. This man loaths everything British. He couldn't keep his trap shut during the opening bars of "God save the Queen" at a state banquet given in his honor by the Queen at Buckingham Palace a few years ago. His first act as President of the USA was to remove a bust of PM Churchill from the Oval Office at the White House and send back to the British Embassy in Washington, DC. This bust of Churchill was given by PM Blair to President Bush after 911 to inspire the USA President.

6 June 2012 at 05:16  
Blogger non mouse said...

Interesting, Penn's Woods (@5:16). I have agreed with you right up until seeing this video. Usually I can't stand the sound of his hamming up (a poor copy of MLK/JFK); certainly you might still be right.

But this time does seem different, for whatever reason...

6 June 2012 at 06:14  
Blogger Alan Douglas said...

So the "special relationship" now means supporting the Argentines in their claims on the Falklands ?

Yep, real special ....

ALan Douglas

6 June 2012 at 07:02  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Alan. At the Summit of the Americas a few months ago President Obama "confused" the Falkland Islands (Malvinas Islands to the Argentines) with the Maldives Islands located in the Indian Ocean. A gaffe like that by former President Bush 43 would have made the world press gasp and roll their eyes and grin knowing he was an "idiot". Obama makes these stupid mistakes over and over and always gets a pass. There is a reason his all his school records are sealed. Any guesses? He himself admitted in his autobiography that his last two years in high school were a drug and alcohol "daze". Yet Europeans still are impressed by his excellent ability to read a teleprompter and forget when he faces tough questions at a press conference he sounds like a blithering idiot with his long pauses and stammering. I'm glad he gave the Queen praise on her Jubilee. Don't believe a word of it.

6 June 2012 at 16:10  
Blogger E.xtra S.ensory Blofeld + Tiddles said...

Alan 6 June 2012 07:02


What with Argentina standing side by side with the USA in Iraq and Afghanistan, how could Obama not support them?*chortles*

A suggestion.

All American troops off sovereign British territory asap? Sounds most excellent to me.

Perhaps the Mexicans could be encouraged to pursue their legitimate claims as Ernst is certain they would appreciate the return of Texas back to them from those European immigrant usurpers up north.


7 June 2012 at 12:01  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Newer›  ‹Older